2019
DOI: 10.31435/rsglobal_wos/31052019/6499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impression Material Selection and Soft Tissue Management in Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics

Abstract: Whether impression is diagnostic or taken for provision of final restoration, its accuracy is crucial for the ultimate outcome. The objective of this review is to provide comprehensive, exhaustive and up-to-date information on impression materials and soft tissue procedures, which will facilitate the dentist's daily work in taking impressions to make various restorations. Taking precise impressions is rather challenging for even experienced dentists. It's rather difficult to achieve perfection, even despite th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is an in-vitro study and has the advantage over clinical research. The impression materials are the vulnerability to the dentine as they can remain inside the dentinal tubules while making an impression that can adversely affect the crown adhesion and subsequent adhesion marginal adaptation [38,44,45]. Dentinal tubules contaminations from oral fluids have also been found during tooth preparation and impression procedures [46][47][48][49][50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an in-vitro study and has the advantage over clinical research. The impression materials are the vulnerability to the dentine as they can remain inside the dentinal tubules while making an impression that can adversely affect the crown adhesion and subsequent adhesion marginal adaptation [38,44,45]. Dentinal tubules contaminations from oral fluids have also been found during tooth preparation and impression procedures [46][47][48][49][50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%