2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2016.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impoverished acoustic input triggers probability-based tone processing in mono-dialectal Mandarin listeners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
4
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because our stimuli did not control the sonority of the syllable onset, we do not examine tone accuracy at early gates or between tone type accuracy (cf. Wiener & Ito, ). Confidence intervals (95% CIs) revealed that native speakers were most accurate [0.99, 1.00], followed by L2 learners at Test 2 [0.79, 0.84], with L2 learners at Test 1 least accurate [0.71, 0.77].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Because our stimuli did not control the sonority of the syllable onset, we do not examine tone accuracy at early gates or between tone type accuracy (cf. Wiener & Ito, ). Confidence intervals (95% CIs) revealed that native speakers were most accurate [0.99, 1.00], followed by L2 learners at Test 2 [0.79, 0.84], with L2 learners at Test 1 least accurate [0.71, 0.77].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the stimuli used in Wiener and Ito (, ) were deemed too difficult for L2 learners, a new set of 48 syllable–tone combinations were created (see Appendix S1 in the Supporting Information online). Items included 24 unique CV(N) syllables, with N indicating an optional nasal coda.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…CV syllables varied in token frequency, co‐occurrence with tone type, and number of tonal homophones. Unique to our experimental design, the stimuli replicated the natural syllable–tone asymmetry, syllable neighborhood density, and syllable–tone homophone density that L2 learners (and L1 speakers) are exposed to in spoken Mandarin (see DeFrancis, ; Duanmu, , , and Wiener & Ito, , , for additional information). This included homophonous items that were differentiated only by their visual form (analogous to English /tu/ as “two,” “to,” and “too”).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%