2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.10.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imposing periodic boundary condition on arbitrary meshes by polynomial interpolation

Abstract: In order to predict the effective properties of heterogeneous materials using the finite element approach, a boundary value problem (BVP) may be defined on a representative volume element (RVE) with appropriate boundary conditions, among which periodic boundary condition is the most efficient in terms of convergence rate. The classical method to impose the periodic boundary condition requires the identical meshes on opposite RVE boundaries. This condition is not always easy to satisfy for arbitrary meshes. Thi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
119
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
119
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While computational algorithms to implement DBC and PBC are well established and discussed by many authors [241,246,462,464,465], special care should be taken to deal with the stiffness matrix singularity due to prescribing a pure Neumann boundary condition on the RVE to implement TBC. Several authors have treated this problem using either mass-type diagonal perturbation to regularize the stiffness matrix [462], construction of a free-flexibility matrix to preserve the rigid body modes [466], adding very soft materials to the microstructure, or in the most extreme case, completely fixing enough degrees-of-freedom to make the problem well defined.…”
Section: Microdeformation Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While computational algorithms to implement DBC and PBC are well established and discussed by many authors [241,246,462,464,465], special care should be taken to deal with the stiffness matrix singularity due to prescribing a pure Neumann boundary condition on the RVE to implement TBC. Several authors have treated this problem using either mass-type diagonal perturbation to regularize the stiffness matrix [462], construction of a free-flexibility matrix to preserve the rigid body modes [466], adding very soft materials to the microstructure, or in the most extreme case, completely fixing enough degrees-of-freedom to make the problem well defined.…”
Section: Microdeformation Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the applicability of the method is restricted on periodic microelement meshes. To alleviate such problems, a procedure has been established for the generalization of the periodic boundary condition assumption allowing its application to nonstructured, non-periodic meshes [42]. Also, refined boundary condition assumptions such as the oversampling technique [19] and the generalized periodic boundary condition method (combining periodic boundary conditions with oversampling) have been effectively used in [63] for non-periodic media.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a more general setting, the conformity of mesh distributions on opposite boundaries of the representative volume element cannot always be guaranteed, leading to a non-periodic mesh. In that case, the periodic boundary conditions can be enforced using the polynomial interpolation method [37]. More details on the periodic boundary conditions enforcement are given in Section 4.…”
Section: Problem At the Microscopic Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [4,7,9], the periodic boundary condition is only applied in case of conforming meshes -two opposite sides of the RVE have the same mesh distribution. On arbitrary meshes another method, as the polynomial interpolation method [37], must be used to constrain the boundary conditions. In that case the matrix C has an arbitrary form.…”
Section: Solution At the Microscopic Scalementioning
confidence: 99%