2009
DOI: 10.7249/mg838
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imported Oil and U.S. National Security

Abstract: This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permission… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The relevant literature and government rule-making have often assumed these costs to be nonlinear and coupled with other US strategic objectives, and they are often omitted from gasoline externality analyses (15)(16)(17). However, work by Delucchi and Murphy estimate the portion of these costs due to oil consumption from the Persian Gulf at $0.03-$0.16 per gallon of gasoline on average (18).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relevant literature and government rule-making have often assumed these costs to be nonlinear and coupled with other US strategic objectives, and they are often omitted from gasoline externality analyses (15)(16)(17). However, work by Delucchi and Murphy estimate the portion of these costs due to oil consumption from the Persian Gulf at $0.03-$0.16 per gallon of gasoline on average (18).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to maintain the flow of oil, the U.S. must spend many tens of billions of dollars each year. The Rand Corporation estimated that the U.S. might be able to save between 12 and 15% of the fiscal year 2008 U.S. defense budget if all concerns for securing oil from the Persian Gulf were to disappear [97]. In addition, the volatility in energy prices restrains economic activity, as businesses and consumers delay purchasing decisions when oil prices increase.…”
Section: ) Hidden Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the United States has practiced this policy in the Middle East since the middle of the 20th century (Bronson, 2006;Lebas, 2006;Crane et al, 2009) 18 and since the 1990s in Africa (Klare, 2004;Klare and Volman, 2006;Shaxson, 2008), 19 not to mention its intervention in Latin American countries.…”
Section: Dmpip Market and Foreign Policymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…17 Other countries which are also great importers (especially China, India, South Korea and Japan) have public agencies and other institutional mechanisms which allow them to establish agreements with the countries and the producing companies so that they can guarantee (at least to a certain extent) the supplies they need (palazuelos, 2008). 18 Crane et al (2009) give an estimate of the economic cost of the U.S. military policy towards the Middle East. Lebas (2006) …”
Section: Dmpip Market and Foreign Policymentioning
confidence: 99%