2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2016.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imported inputs, irreversibility, and international trade dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the literature does not need any complicated solutions to the international elasticity puzzle as opposed to studies such as by Ruhl (2008), Fitzgerald and Haller (2014), Crucini and Davis (2016), Ramanarayanan (2015) or Arkolakis, Eaton, and Kortum (2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, the literature does not need any complicated solutions to the international elasticity puzzle as opposed to studies such as by Ruhl (2008), Fitzgerald and Haller (2014), Crucini and Davis (2016), Ramanarayanan (2015) or Arkolakis, Eaton, and Kortum (2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In contrast, the existing literature has focused on many solutions to the puzzle based on the supply side. For example, Ruhl (2008) has proposed a solution based on …rm-level entry costs and uncertainties on future productivities in a Melitz (2003) framework; Fitzgerald and Haller (2014) have both …xed and sunk costs of export participation, where participation in di¤erent export markets are considered as independent decisions after conditioning on a common marginal cost of production; Crucini and Davis (2016) consider the speed of adjustment of capital in the distribution sector; Ramanarayanan (2015) considers intermediate inputs in which heterogeneous producers face a plant-level irreversibility in the structure of inputs used in production; Arkolakis, Eaton, and Kortum (2012) consider the di¤erence between the adjustments in extensive and intensive margins of trade in an Eaton and Kortum (2002) framework. Accordingly, it is implied by the demand-side investigation in this paper that we do not need such supply-side complications in order to understand the puzzling di¤erence between macro elasticities of the two literatures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the recognised importance of hysteresis and irreversibilities in international trade (e.g. Baldwin, 1990;Ramanarayanan, 2017), the consequences for international trade patterns might be longlasting.…”
Section: Lasting Changes In Competitive Positions and Macroeconomic Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this extensive margin, we can generate the sort of large aggregate Armington elasticity—the elasticity of substitution between imported and domestic goods—found in the data without assuming unusually large elasticities at the level of an individual firm. Ramanarayanan () considers the effects of import decisions on the Armington elasticity from a dynamic perspective. He builds a dynamic model in which entering firms make irreversible decisions about their import status in the presence of aggregate and idiosyncratic uncertainty and uses the model to contrast the effects of business‐cycle shocks and trade liberalizations on the Armington elasticity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%