2018
DOI: 10.1002/dta.2402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Important considerations for the utilisation of methanolysis in steroid analysis

Abstract: The effective analysis of anabolic-androgenic steroids in urine usually requires a suitable deconjugation method for the analysis of phase II metabolites such as sulphates and glucuronides. Acid hydrolysis using methanolysis is one adopted method of deconjugation that efficiently and rapidly cleaves both sulphates and glucuronides contemporaneously. The formation of artefactual by-products is a known disadvantage of this harsh method. However, the possible promotion of deuterium-hydrogen exchange of isotopical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chemical hydrolysis offers an alternative to enzymatic hydrolysis, involving either solvolysis (Hauser et al, 2008) or hot acid (typically HCl or H 2 SO 4 ) hydrolysis (Dumasia & Houghton, 1981; Konieczna et al, 2011; Pizzato et al, 2017). Many hydrolyses undergo methanolysis, a variation of solvolysis (Cooper et al, 2001; Tseng et al, 2006), in which the oxygen attached to C‐17 undergoes protonation during strong acidic conditions, utilizing acetyl chloride in methanol, resulting in the simultaneous separation of sulfate and glucuronide moieties (Viljanto et al, 2018). Chemical hydrolysis via ethyl acetate/methanol/sulfuric acid 80:20:0,12 (v/v) provided the best hydrolysis response of at least 50% across testosterone, epitestosterone, androsterone, etiocholanolone, 5‐androstene‐3β,17β‐diol, 5α‐androstane‐3β,17β‐diol, DHEA, epiandrosterone, 11‐ketoetiocholanolone and cholesterol for the cleaving of the sulfate moiety in comparison to enzymatic hydrolysis (Iannone et al, 2020).…”
Section: Sample Pretreatment and Extraction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemical hydrolysis offers an alternative to enzymatic hydrolysis, involving either solvolysis (Hauser et al, 2008) or hot acid (typically HCl or H 2 SO 4 ) hydrolysis (Dumasia & Houghton, 1981; Konieczna et al, 2011; Pizzato et al, 2017). Many hydrolyses undergo methanolysis, a variation of solvolysis (Cooper et al, 2001; Tseng et al, 2006), in which the oxygen attached to C‐17 undergoes protonation during strong acidic conditions, utilizing acetyl chloride in methanol, resulting in the simultaneous separation of sulfate and glucuronide moieties (Viljanto et al, 2018). Chemical hydrolysis via ethyl acetate/methanol/sulfuric acid 80:20:0,12 (v/v) provided the best hydrolysis response of at least 50% across testosterone, epitestosterone, androsterone, etiocholanolone, 5‐androstene‐3β,17β‐diol, 5α‐androstane‐3β,17β‐diol, DHEA, epiandrosterone, 11‐ketoetiocholanolone and cholesterol for the cleaving of the sulfate moiety in comparison to enzymatic hydrolysis (Iannone et al, 2020).…”
Section: Sample Pretreatment and Extraction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deuterated IS can potentially experience hydrogen-deuterium exchange ( Kwok et al, 2008 ; Viljanto et al, 2018 ), so we tested for possible alterations of 17β-E 2 -d4 caused by the derivatization procedure. We compared the mass spectra of 17β-E 2 -d4 directly from the stock solution, after sham derivatization (resuspension in buffer and acetone followed by incubation for 15 min at 60°C, without DMIS), or after derivatization (resuspension in buffer and DMIS in acetone followed by incubation for 15 min at 60°C).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%