Important B-cell epitopes for neutralization of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat in serum samples of humans and different animal species immunized with Tat protein or peptides
Abstract:The Tat regulatory protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) is secreted by infected cells and plays a key role in viral pathogenesis and replication. Tat protein has been proposed as a target antigen for vaccine design since anti-Tat antibodies may interfere with virus spread and disease progression. The aim of this study was to analyse the serum antibody response of mice, rabbits, macaques and humans immunized with recombinant Tat, synthetic Tat, Tat toxoid or Tat peptides and to examine the bio… Show more
“…Both dsRNA motifs potentiated the anti-Tat antibody responses, which were comparable to those elicited in the presence of CT. Analysis of the fine-specificity of anti-Tat IgG antibodies using synthetic peptides revealed strong reactivity with peptides 1-20 and 44-61, which represent important epitopes [10,[19][20][21][22][31][32][33][34][35]. However, only sera of mice immunized with sTat and pI:pC motif inhibited Tat-driven transactivation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specificity of serum antibodies was determined using ELISA plates coated with peptides 1-20 and 44-61, which have been reported to represent critical neutralizing B cell epitopes of Tat protein [19][20][21][22] and have limited antigenic polymorphism among HIV-1 strains [23]. Although all tested sera reacted with both peptides (Fig.…”
In this study we examined the hypothesis that the binding affinity of two doublestranded (ds) RNA motifs to HIV-1 Tat protein might affect transactivation and the type of anti-Tat immune responses. Using surface plasmon resonance technology we demonstrated the capacity of the poly(A):poly(U) (pA:pU) motif to bind with high affinity to a totally synthetic Tat protein and to inhibit more efficiently the Tat/ transactivation response element (TAR) RNA interaction as compared to the poly(I):poly(C) (pI:pC) motif. Furthermore, the pA:pU motif was tenfold more effective in inhibiting Tat-driven transactivation than the pI:pC motif. Following intranasal immunization of mice, both dsRNA motifs enhanced the antibody (serum and mucosal) and cellular responses to Tat. However, only the serum samples of mice immunized with Tat + pI:pC inhibited Tat-driven transactivation. The profile of serum antibody subclasses together with the secreted cytokines by Tat-stimulated splenocyte cultures indicated that both dsRNA motifs favored the induction of a balanced Th1 and Th2 immune response. The demonstration in this study that two dsRNA motifs had a marked effect on Tat/TAR RNA interaction and on the neutralizing capacity of anti-Tat specific antibody responses highlights their potential for biological applications and the importance of selecting the appropriate motif as an adjuvant for vaccine design.
“…Both dsRNA motifs potentiated the anti-Tat antibody responses, which were comparable to those elicited in the presence of CT. Analysis of the fine-specificity of anti-Tat IgG antibodies using synthetic peptides revealed strong reactivity with peptides 1-20 and 44-61, which represent important epitopes [10,[19][20][21][22][31][32][33][34][35]. However, only sera of mice immunized with sTat and pI:pC motif inhibited Tat-driven transactivation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specificity of serum antibodies was determined using ELISA plates coated with peptides 1-20 and 44-61, which have been reported to represent critical neutralizing B cell epitopes of Tat protein [19][20][21][22] and have limited antigenic polymorphism among HIV-1 strains [23]. Although all tested sera reacted with both peptides (Fig.…”
In this study we examined the hypothesis that the binding affinity of two doublestranded (ds) RNA motifs to HIV-1 Tat protein might affect transactivation and the type of anti-Tat immune responses. Using surface plasmon resonance technology we demonstrated the capacity of the poly(A):poly(U) (pA:pU) motif to bind with high affinity to a totally synthetic Tat protein and to inhibit more efficiently the Tat/ transactivation response element (TAR) RNA interaction as compared to the poly(I):poly(C) (pI:pC) motif. Furthermore, the pA:pU motif was tenfold more effective in inhibiting Tat-driven transactivation than the pI:pC motif. Following intranasal immunization of mice, both dsRNA motifs enhanced the antibody (serum and mucosal) and cellular responses to Tat. However, only the serum samples of mice immunized with Tat + pI:pC inhibited Tat-driven transactivation. The profile of serum antibody subclasses together with the secreted cytokines by Tat-stimulated splenocyte cultures indicated that both dsRNA motifs favored the induction of a balanced Th1 and Th2 immune response. The demonstration in this study that two dsRNA motifs had a marked effect on Tat/TAR RNA interaction and on the neutralizing capacity of anti-Tat specific antibody responses highlights their potential for biological applications and the importance of selecting the appropriate motif as an adjuvant for vaccine design.
“…In addition, evidence exists that natural IgM antibodies reacting with Tat may provide an early initial defense against the pathological effects of Tat after HIV infection and influence the course of AIDS progression [131,132]. Similarly, immunization with Tat elicits antibody responses in rodents, monkeys, and humans able to block the activity of extracellular Tat on cellular entry, gene expression, and replication [4,84,[133][134][135][136][137][138][139][140][141][142]. Moreover, strong anti-Tat antibody responses correlated with an efficient reduction in plasma viremia and long-term protection in Tat protein-vaccinated monkeys challenged intrarectally with an heterologous SHIV virus [143].…”
Section: The Choice Of Tat As Vaccine Relevant Antigenmentioning
“…It has been recently shown that antibodies directed against the N-terminus region of Tat, which is the most immunogenic in terms of humoral responses, 32,33 protect monkeys from infection acquisition, 15 suggesting that the Tat 1-20 peptide constitutes an interesting candidate for a preventive vaccine. To assess how different routes of administration may affect humoral immunogenicity of peptide vaccines, mice were vaccinated 3 times (at days 1, 14 and 28), by ID or OM route, with Tat 1-20 peptide (EPVDPRLEPWKHPGSQPKT, synthesized by solid phase method and purified by HPLC to >98% purity by UF Peptides, University of Ferrara, Italy), encompassing an immunodominant Tat epitope, 32,33 at the dose of 7mg.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess how different routes of administration may affect humoral immunogenicity of peptide vaccines, mice were vaccinated 3 times (at days 1, 14 and 28), by ID or OM route, with Tat 1-20 peptide (EPVDPRLEPWKHPGSQPKT, synthesized by solid phase method and purified by HPLC to >98% purity by UF Peptides, University of Ferrara, Italy), encompassing an immunodominant Tat epitope, 32,33 at the dose of 7mg. This dose contains the same number of molecules of 30mg of Tat protein.…”
The use of the Tat protein of HIV in vaccines against AIDS showed promising results in primate and human studies. To characterize the impact of the administration route on the induction of humoral responses at systemic and mucosal levels, we compared intradermal, intramuscular and mucosal immunizations with Tat and a Tat-derived peptide. Mice were immunized with the Tat protein by different routes and the titer and isotype of anti-Tat antibodies were assessed in serum and mucosal lavages. Intramuscular and intradermal administrations showed comparable immunogenicity, while the mucosal administration was unable to induce IgM in serum and IgG at mucosal sites but showed superior immunogenicity in terms of IgA induction. Anti-Tat antibodies were also obtained upon vaccination with the immunodominant Tat 1–20 peptide which was, however, less immunogenic than the whole Tat protein
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.