2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.reuma.2022.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importancia de los títulos de anticuerpos antifosfolípidos no criterio entre pacientes con síndrome antifosfolípido primario y pacientes con lupus eritematoso sistémico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
2

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In a Latino population, we found the frequency of the lupus anticoagulant, 5.3%, to be higher than the 1 found in Hispanic patients from the LUMINA (lupus in minorities: nature versus nurture) cohort (2.0%–2.5%) and lower than in Mestizo patients from the GLADEL (Grupo Latino Americano de Estudio del Lupus) cohort (24.7%); of note, the frequency of IgM aCL antibodies in our cohort was also lower to the 1 reported in the GLADEL cohort (21.8% vs 42.6%) 7 ; that was also the case for IgG aCL antibodies, which was lower in our cohort (13.4% vs 48.7%) 16 . For aβ2GPI, antibodies that were not examined in the aforementioned studies, their frequency was higher than the 1 reported by Urrego-Callejas et al 17 : 15.0% for IgG and 10.0% for IgM. The differences in the prevalence of each antibody on these studies could be explained by differences in sample size, the techniques used to assess them, and/or the miscegenation of the populations studied.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…In a Latino population, we found the frequency of the lupus anticoagulant, 5.3%, to be higher than the 1 found in Hispanic patients from the LUMINA (lupus in minorities: nature versus nurture) cohort (2.0%–2.5%) and lower than in Mestizo patients from the GLADEL (Grupo Latino Americano de Estudio del Lupus) cohort (24.7%); of note, the frequency of IgM aCL antibodies in our cohort was also lower to the 1 reported in the GLADEL cohort (21.8% vs 42.6%) 7 ; that was also the case for IgG aCL antibodies, which was lower in our cohort (13.4% vs 48.7%) 16 . For aβ2GPI, antibodies that were not examined in the aforementioned studies, their frequency was higher than the 1 reported by Urrego-Callejas et al 17 : 15.0% for IgG and 10.0% for IgM. The differences in the prevalence of each antibody on these studies could be explained by differences in sample size, the techniques used to assess them, and/or the miscegenation of the populations studied.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…Even though the hypothesis that the non-criteria aPL profile could represent a distinguishing mark between the primary and secondary APS patients was raised, further studies are necessary to confirm this possible role of non-classical aPLs [29]. Our results did not show any significant differences between the titres of non-criteria aPLs in primary and secondary APS.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%