2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.spa.2020.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importance sampling correction versus standard averages of reversible MCMCs in terms of the asymptotic variance

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the theoretical understanding of delayedacceptance methods is still limited, several results are available. [55] compares the ergodicity properties of a delayed-acceptance algorithm with those of the parent MH algorithm, while [28] compares the asymptotic variance of the ergodic average from a delayed-acceptance algorithm with the variance of an importance-sampling estimator which takes as its proposal a sample from an MCMC algorithm targeting a surrogate. Historically, insights into the performance and tuning of MCMC algorithms have been obtained by examining the limiting behaviour of a rescaled version of the Markov chain as the dimension of the statespace increases to infinity [6,8,44,45,46,57,62,63].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the theoretical understanding of delayedacceptance methods is still limited, several results are available. [55] compares the ergodicity properties of a delayed-acceptance algorithm with those of the parent MH algorithm, while [28] compares the asymptotic variance of the ergodic average from a delayed-acceptance algorithm with the variance of an importance-sampling estimator which takes as its proposal a sample from an MCMC algorithm targeting a surrogate. Historically, insights into the performance and tuning of MCMC algorithms have been obtained by examining the limiting behaviour of a rescaled version of the Markov chain as the dimension of the statespace increases to infinity [6,8,44,45,46,57,62,63].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, in case of , the result holds because we may regard as an augmented version of (e.g. Franks and Vihola 2020 ). We conclude that where the integral defines a probability measure independent of .…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…For example, it could be used as the cheap approximate likelihood within a delayed-acceptance MCMC algorithm (e.g. Sherlock et al, 2017 and or importance sampling scheme (Franks and Vihola, 2017). Alternatively, we might bridge our approximate posterior with the true posterior using sequential Monte Carlo.…”
Section: Neuroscience Example Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%