1985
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(85)80009-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importance of the two-step crystal growth model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that the coexistence of K 2 CO 3 , which is highly soluble, is assumed to have no effect on the solubility of KHCO 3 . The variable k g represents the two stages of the crystal growth process following the formation of stable nuclei: bulk diffusion to the crystal surface and surface reaction or integration (Karpinski, 1985). The value of k g is a function of temperature following an Arrhenius relationship (Garside et al, 1982):…”
Section: Theory Of Crystallization Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the coexistence of K 2 CO 3 , which is highly soluble, is assumed to have no effect on the solubility of KHCO 3 . The variable k g represents the two stages of the crystal growth process following the formation of stable nuclei: bulk diffusion to the crystal surface and surface reaction or integration (Karpinski, 1985). The value of k g is a function of temperature following an Arrhenius relationship (Garside et al, 1982):…”
Section: Theory Of Crystallization Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the two-step model [12], the overall growth process is divided into a mass transfer step with a related diffusion coefficient (k d ) and a surface integration process with its corresponding coefficient (k r ). The relation among k g , k d , and k r is:…”
Section: Crystallization Kinetic Expressionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dependence of growth rate on supersaturation can be It is generally accepted that the growth process consists of two Bulk diffusion stages (Mullin, 1972;Karpinski, 1985):…”
Section: Linear Growth Ratementioning
confidence: 99%