2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importance of the matrix in determining small-mammal assemblages in an Amazonian forest-savanna mosaic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies have shown that the matrix matters more than fragment size for small mammals [8,64]; however, for some Neotropical primates, the pattern is contrary, and fragment size is more important than components in the matrix [7]. Here, we present empirical support to show that in the entire Neotropical region, fragment size is more important than matrix components for primate species.…”
Section: Relationship Between Matrix and Site Attributes And Primate supporting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Other studies have shown that the matrix matters more than fragment size for small mammals [8,64]; however, for some Neotropical primates, the pattern is contrary, and fragment size is more important than components in the matrix [7]. Here, we present empirical support to show that in the entire Neotropical region, fragment size is more important than matrix components for primate species.…”
Section: Relationship Between Matrix and Site Attributes And Primate supporting
confidence: 68%
“…We imported the polygons created in Google Earth into QGIS (version 2.14.8-Essen; QGIS Development Team 2014, Essen, Germany), saved them as a shapefile and re-projected all in WGS84 datum in the Universal Transversal Mercator (UTM) coordinate system. We generated a 1-km buffer from the border of the fragment to characterize the matrix within the buffer, a method that has been used for small mammals and primates in Neotropical studies [7,8,64,65]. We selected this buffer size because it is the mean travel distance in the matrix reported for some Neotropical primates [66][67][68].…”
Section: Geographic Information System (Gis) Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is also the case of small mammal persistence in other fragmented tropical forest landscapes [53,54], where species continue to occupy small forest patches that are otherwise too small to maintain functionally isolated populations (i.e., when individuals are able to move between patches, also known as the 'rescue effect') [55,56]. In fragmented landscapes, forest patch size is generally more important in explaining species persistence than either isolation [49,57] or matrix habitat quality [15,58]. Yet, some limitations of SARs include the fact that in practice some species may also persist in non-forest areas [59].…”
Section: Forest Area Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the patch scale, habitat patches may become progressively smaller and more isolated, while at a landscape scale, they may disappear altogether (Fahrig, 2003). The occupation of these forest patches by animal populations will depend on the dynamics of the exploitation of the resources available in the patches themselves and the surrounding matrix (Santos, Chiarello, Ribeiro, Ribeiro, & Paglia, 2016), which will influence the resilience of the populations or their susceptibility to extinction (Arroyo-Rodríguez et al, 2017;Borges-Matos, Aragón, Silva, Fortin, & Magnusson, 2016;Brady, McAlpine, Possingham, Miller, & Baxter, 2011). Ultimately, the socioecology of the species may also influence patch occupation patterns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%