2012
DOI: 10.1108/00483481211263692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importance of system and leadership in performance appraisal

Abstract: characteristics of the teacher performance appraisal system and the school leader for procedural justice and perceived feedback utility by teachers. Methodology: Both interviews with school leaders and a questionnaire for teachers were used to collect our data in 32 schools. Path analyses (n=298) were used to test our research model. Findings: The results indicate that teacher participation in the teacher performance appraisal system significantly influences the perceived procedural justice by teachers which i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
43
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(86 reference statements)
3
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…People need to know in a timely manner how they are doing, what is working, and what is not. (Tuytens & Devos, 2012) Feedback should be given in a manner that will best help improve performance. Since people respond better to information presented in a positive way, feedback should be expressed in a positive manner (Gbadamosi & Ross, 2012).…”
Section: Feedback In Performance Appraisal On the Organizational Perfmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…People need to know in a timely manner how they are doing, what is working, and what is not. (Tuytens & Devos, 2012) Feedback should be given in a manner that will best help improve performance. Since people respond better to information presented in a positive way, feedback should be expressed in a positive manner (Gbadamosi & Ross, 2012).…”
Section: Feedback In Performance Appraisal On the Organizational Perfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performance testing is an informational system which is the essential core of the performance appraisal process (Tuytens & Devos, 2012). This has a vital significance for the system of performance appraisal to be effective and efficient.…”
Section: Background Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An effective performance appraisal system requires that employees' roles and responsibilities be clarified beforehand so that it could be explained how the roles and responsibilities contribute to wider team or organisational goals. This practice creates linkages between individual employee performance with organisational goals without which, entropy and not synergy, becomes the order of the day (Tuytens & Devos, 2012). According to Robbins (2001), supervisors, peers, self or others, depending on the organisation, can conduct a performance review.…”
Section: Performance Appraisal Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apparent from the empirical data is that the job responsibilities and duties are not clearly specified and clearly defined in the demarcated area of study. Tuytens and Devos (2012) propose that employees' roles and responsibilities should be properly identified after which they should be used as a predication against which their performance will be appraised. To enhance the effectiveness of the performance appraisal, employees' roles and responsibilities should be clearly specified and defined.…”
Section: Empirical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aguinis, Joo, and Gottfredson (2011) found that while performance appraisal was utilized in the majority of organizations, 70% of employees felt that these appraisals did not contribute to their professional development. Darling-Hammond, Newton, and Wei (2013) and Firestone (2014) believed that though modest progress has been made in this field, teacher performance appraisal is essential in estimating the quality of teaching and students' learning (Tuytens & Devos, 2012;Wang, Tseng, Yen, & Huang, 2011). Due to the inconsistencies in many current teacher appraisal processes, teachers tend to view them negatively (O'Pry & Schumacher, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%