2013
DOI: 10.1111/1348-0421.12058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importance of rabies virus nucleoprotein in viral evasion of interferon response in the brain

Abstract: By using a cultured neuroblastoma cell line, the present authors recently showed that the N protein of virulent rabies virus fixed strain Nishigahara (Ni), but not that of the attenuated derivative Ni-CE, mediates evasion of induction of type I interferon (IFN). In this study, to determine whether Ni N protein indeed fulfills this function in vivo, the abilities to suppress IFN responses in the mouse brain of Ni-CE and the virulent chimeric virus CE(NiN), which has the N gene from Ni in the genetic background … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since type I IFN signaling is important for protection against infection, it is not surprising that the RABV itself dedicates substantial resources to blocking type I IFN signaling. Both the N and P genes of RABV express products that interfere with type I IFN signaling (50,51), and mutation of P can attenuate the virus (52). The blockade of type I IFN by RABV is a "leaky" process, however, and the host response is able to impede replication and spread to some degree despite this immunoevasion strategy (48).…”
Section: Fig 10mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since type I IFN signaling is important for protection against infection, it is not surprising that the RABV itself dedicates substantial resources to blocking type I IFN signaling. Both the N and P genes of RABV express products that interfere with type I IFN signaling (50,51), and mutation of P can attenuate the virus (52). The blockade of type I IFN by RABV is a "leaky" process, however, and the host response is able to impede replication and spread to some degree despite this immunoevasion strategy (48).…”
Section: Fig 10mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, N protein was related to RABV pathogenicity in adult mice in a comparison between nonlethal strain Ni-CE and virulent strain Nishigahara [36]. The virulent RABV N protein suppresses induction of interferon and chemokines in neuroblastoma cells and is important for inhibition of innate immune response, viral propagation, and spread of pathogenicity in the mouse brain [37, 38]. Thus it is assumed that vaccination of mice in our study with street RABV N protein contributed to their survival after IC exposure to RABV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complete encapsidation is hypothesized to protect the RNA from recognition by the innate immune system of the host—more specifically recognition by Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and RLRs [166]. Furthermore, the N protein has a vital role in the suppression of the innate immune response during infection, allowing for increased viral replication and spread in the brain and CNS of the infected individual [167,168,169]. …”
Section: How Does Rabv Do It?—the Mechanisms By Which Rabv Sequestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was shown both in vivo and in vitro and was not related to the specific expression of viral genomic RNA. In a series of studies performed by Masatani and colleagues [167,168,169], the N gene from the pathogenic Nishigahara strain was inserted in place of the N gene in the attenuated Ni-CE strain, resulting in the formation of CE(NiN). The CE(NiN) and Ni strains showed greater inhibitions of the innate immune response—specifically IFN-β and chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 10 (CXCL10)—when compared to the attenuated wild-type Ni-CE strain.…”
Section: How Does Rabv Do It?—the Mechanisms By Which Rabv Sequestmentioning
confidence: 99%