2018
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare6020030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importance of Patient–Provider Communication to Adherence in Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes

Abstract: Effective communication between pediatric diabetes patients and their providers has the potential to enhance patient satisfaction and health outcomes, as well as improve diabetes-related self-management. In this review, we highlight the importance of communication between patients and providers, focusing on the effect of communication on adherence in the high-risk population of adolescents with type 1 diabetes. We synthesize the literature describing patient–provider communication in pediatric populations and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Collaborative communication between providers and patients is viewed as a key element in achieving favorable health outcomes in disease management [30]. However, challenges around adequate communication and the ability to access timely health-related information continue to be a barrier to optimal type 1 diabetes care for youth [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Collaborative communication between providers and patients is viewed as a key element in achieving favorable health outcomes in disease management [30]. However, challenges around adequate communication and the ability to access timely health-related information continue to be a barrier to optimal type 1 diabetes care for youth [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, challenges around adequate communication and the ability to access timely health-related information continue to be a barrier to optimal type 1 diabetes care for youth [31]. The use of technology has been recommended as an avenue for improving communication with adolescents [30]. Youth in this study provided insights into their specific communication preferences on the basis of the perceived affordances of social media, and they expressed a clear interest in using some features of social media platforms to facilitate increased contact outside of clinic visits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the differences between initiating a healthy behavior such as exercise and receiving instructions for posthospital care versus potential consequences of poor glycemic control [44], this suggests that Ragts may be an acceptable way to extend care for a variety of diverse behaviors outside of traditional settings. In the management of a chronic condition, such as T1D, patient-provider communication is an essential component of care [45]. Therefore, our goal was not to supplant this relationship but to extend care outside the clinical setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exception was their stronger preference for talking with their doctor or nurse, rather than Ashley, about T1D. As discussed above, given that the patient-provider relationship is essential to the care of T1D, particularly in adolescents [45], this finding is not surprising. The goal when working with chronic disease management should not be to supplant or interfere with the patient-provider relationship but to augment and support it and extend care beyond the clinical setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, evidence indicates that there are strong positive relationships between a healthcare team communication with the patient and patient satisfaction, adherence to treatment plan, and improved health outcomes. [22][23][24] Our findings have a significant implication on how providers should manage diabetic patients, particularly those with complications, disabilities, and coexisting chronic conditions. The current structure of care focuses narrowly on measures with a minimal impact on the overall wellbeing of patients with a diverse combination of chronic diseases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%