2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2018.03.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importance of numerical analyses for determining support systems in tunneling: A comparative study from the trabzon-gumushane tunnel, Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The RMR recommended support with bolts and Shotcrete were installed in the models prepared in RS 2 software decreases the total displacement and thickness of plastic zone around the tunnel. The present study confirms the previous results of Kaya et al (2011), Kanik et al (2015), Kanik et al (2018) and others that the numerical modeling is necessary for the support design and verify the support recommended by the empirical methods. The study also concludes that the empirical systems cannot predict the thickness of plastic zone around the tunnel and the displacement of tunnel inward that can be predicted well with numerical modeling such as RS 2 software.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The RMR recommended support with bolts and Shotcrete were installed in the models prepared in RS 2 software decreases the total displacement and thickness of plastic zone around the tunnel. The present study confirms the previous results of Kaya et al (2011), Kanik et al (2015), Kanik et al (2018) and others that the numerical modeling is necessary for the support design and verify the support recommended by the empirical methods. The study also concludes that the empirical systems cannot predict the thickness of plastic zone around the tunnel and the displacement of tunnel inward that can be predicted well with numerical modeling such as RS 2 software.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Recently, different researchers like Ozsan et al [12]; Genis et al [11]; Rasouli [13]; Krishna and Panthi [14]; Kaya, Bulut [15]; Panda et al [16]; Akgün et al [17]; Elarabi and Mustafa [18] and others in different countries and geological domains have concluded that the empirical systems should be used side by side with any of the pre-described methods at various phases of engineering projects. Larbi [19]; Kanik et al [20]; Kanik et al [21] highlighted that the empirical approaches do not determine the plastic zone thickness and values of total displacement. They concluded that numerical modeling should be used for the determination of these factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters of the recommended support in Table 2 were substituted into the above equations to obtain the maximum support pressure, elastic stiffness, and the maximum possible deformation for the combined support systems. (Ghadimi Chermahini & Tahghighi, 2019;Kanik & Gurocak, 2018;Morris & Johnson, 2009;Rehman et al, 2020;Xing et al, 2019). For this study, Phase 2 V. 7.0, a FEM software, was used to model the deformations and plastic zones around the tunnel.…”
Section: The Critical Internal Pressure P Crmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stability around an underground excavation is affected by external and internal factors. These factors include; the type of intact rock, type and nature of discontinuities, in-situ stresses, hydrological conditions, and the excavation geometries (Kanik & Gurocak, 2018;Rehman et al, 2020;Xing et al, 2019). Discontinuities such as bedding planes, joints, dykes, shear zones, and faults significantly reduce the strength of the rock mass, complicate the mechanical behavior of the rock mass, and increases the rock deformability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A yielding support system was proposed by Wu et al [30] to cope with the extreme deformation problem for a soft rock tunnel excavated in squeezing ground. Kanik and Gurocak [31] conducted a deep study on empirical rock mass classification system and established an optimal support unit through a comparative numerical analysis. e analytical methods provide a lot of support for tunnel design and construction simulation; however, an accurate rock mass model is difficult to establish due to the discontinuity, anisotropy, heterogeneity and inelasticity of rock mass [32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%