2020
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.26164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importance of model size in quantum mechanical studies of DNA intercalation

Abstract: The convergence of DFT‐computed interaction energies with increasing binding site model size was assessed. The data show that while accurate intercalator interaction energies can be derived from binding site models featuring only the flanking nucleotides for uncharged intercalators that bind parallel to the DNA base pairs, errors remain significant even when including distant nucleotides for intercalators that are charged, exhibit groove‐binding tails that engage in noncovalent interactions with distant nucleo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Turning to a comparison with results for the minimal-basis method HF-3c [128], we see that the MAD value for HF-3c, at 2.00 kcal mol −1 , is more than double that for CX. In other words, CX competes well with the best hybrid results of reference [128], and offers a path to acceleration that gives improved predictability compared to the HF-3c minimal-basis-set approach.…”
Section: Systemmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Turning to a comparison with results for the minimal-basis method HF-3c [128], we see that the MAD value for HF-3c, at 2.00 kcal mol −1 , is more than double that for CX. In other words, CX competes well with the best hybrid results of reference [128], and offers a path to acceleration that gives improved predictability compared to the HF-3c minimal-basis-set approach.…”
Section: Systemmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The comparison is made against the CCSD(T)-extrapolated results from reference [128], and with their B3LYP-D3, and HF-3c results. The three intercalants have PDB codes 1K9G, 1DL8 and 1Z3F and are here (and in reference [128]) denoted '1', '2', and '3' (see top and middle panels of figure 6). The latter molecule includes a nitrogen atom that can be protonated and this is also included in the set of calculations, the protonated molecule is denoted '3 + '.…”
Section: Dna-intercalation Energiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Biomolecule-Biomolecule subset contains model systems representative of nucleotide-nucleotide interactions as well as protein fragments interacting with carbohydrates, nucleotides, drugs, water, and with other proteins. Such interactions are relevant in applications like protein folding 241,242 , protein structure refinement 243,244 , protein-ligand binding [245][246][247] , intercalation 248 , nucleobase stacking 249 , and protein hydration 250 , to name a few. Uncorrected minimal or double-ζ basis set HF-D3 in general overestimate the interaction energies in this subset, and application of the ACPs reduces this overestimation and decreases the error spread and SDs.…”
Section: (I) Non-covalent Interaction Energiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of DNA fragments and of their assembly from building blocks is a rich research field. It is a goal of the overall vdW-DF method and long-term research program to realize accurate computationally effective studies of structure, of defects and intercalation [136], of fluorescence-marker base substitutions [137,138], as well as of molecular dynamics to determine the entropic effects [139]. All of these problems are interesting for biochemistry in their own right.…”
Section: Biochemistry Testing and Organic Ferroelectricsmentioning
confidence: 99%