2016
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.160267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importance of metabolic rate to the relationship between the number of genes in a functional category and body size in Peto's paradox for cancer

Abstract: Elucidation of tumour suppression mechanisms is a major challenge in cancer biology. Therefore, Peto's paradox, or low cancer incidence in large animals, has attracted focus. According to the gene-abundance hypothesis, which considers the increase/decrease in cancer-related genes with body size, researchers evaluated the associations between gene abundance and body size. However, previous studies only focused on a few specific gene functions and have ignored the alternative hypothesis (metabolic rate hypothesi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the ultimate resolution to Peto's paradox is that largebodied and/or long-lived species evolved enhanced cancer protection mechanisms, identifying and characterizing those mechanisms is essential for elucidating how enhanced cancer resistance and thus large bodies and long life spans evolved. Numerous and diverse mechanisms have been proposed to resolve Peto's paradox (Caulin and Maley, 2011;Dang, 2015;Katzourakis et al, 2014;Leroi et al, 2003;Maciak and Michalak, 2015;Nagy et al, 2007;Nunney, 1999;Takemoto et al, 2016), but discovering those mechanisms has been challenging because the ideal study system is one in which a large, long-lived species is deeply nested within a clade of smaller, short-lived species-all of which have sequenced genomes. Unfortunately, few lineages fit this pattern.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the ultimate resolution to Peto's paradox is that largebodied and/or long-lived species evolved enhanced cancer protection mechanisms, identifying and characterizing those mechanisms is essential for elucidating how enhanced cancer resistance and thus large bodies and long life spans evolved. Numerous and diverse mechanisms have been proposed to resolve Peto's paradox (Caulin and Maley, 2011;Dang, 2015;Katzourakis et al, 2014;Leroi et al, 2003;Maciak and Michalak, 2015;Nagy et al, 2007;Nunney, 1999;Takemoto et al, 2016), but discovering those mechanisms has been challenging because the ideal study system is one in which a large, long-lived species is deeply nested within a clade of smaller, short-lived species-all of which have sequenced genomes. Unfortunately, few lineages fit this pattern.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Homologous genes in the same species whose E < 10 –5 and query coverage > 30% were defined as duplicated genes. We collected data on mass-specific metabolic rates B c (W g −1 ) and body mass M (g) from our previous studies [ 12 , 16 ]. The data for 32 mammalian species are available in the electronic supplementary material, table S1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…phylogenetic generalized least squares) for all 389 explanatory variables. However, we could not perform such an analysis in this study because of the combinatorial explosion in model selection and the multicollinearity that mainly arises from gene overlap among functional categories or the hierarchical organization of functional categories [ 12 , 16 ]. In fact, we were unable to perform the phylogenetic generalized least squares using the gls function in the R-package nlme (v. 3.1–128) because of singularities in the regression model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the ultimate resolution to Peto's paradox is that large bodied and/or long-lived species evolved enhanced cancer protection mechanisms, identifying and characterizing those mechanisms is essential for elucidating how enhanced cancer resistance and thus large bodies and long lifespans evolved. Numerous and diverse mechanisms have been proposed to resolve Peto's paradox (Caulin and Maley, 2011;Dang, 2015;Katzourakis et al, 2014;Leroi et al, 2003;Maciak and Michalak, 2015;Nagy et al, 2007;Nunney, 1999;Takemoto et al, 2016), but discovering those mechanisms has been challenging because the ideal study system is one in which a large, long-lived species is deeply nested within a clade of smaller, short-lived speciesall of which have sequenced genomes. Unfortunately, few lineages fit this pattern.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%