2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2008.08.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importance of LPS structure on protein interactions with Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, Abu-Lail and coworkers (2) observed that bacterial adhesion to silica is significantly higher for P. aeruginosa strain AK1401, a mutant that lacks B-band O antigen, than for P. aeruginosa PAO1, while adhesion to organics is stronger in the wild-type strain. In separate studies, however, this research group observed that adhesion to silicon was stronger for strain PAO1 than for strain AK1401 (8), while adhesion to serum albumin was three times higher in the mutant (9). These conflicting results in comparing the adhesive strengths of wild-type and LPS variant strains might have been caused by the use of sample preparation techniques and testing environments that have not been standardized in the different studies (28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Likewise, Abu-Lail and coworkers (2) observed that bacterial adhesion to silica is significantly higher for P. aeruginosa strain AK1401, a mutant that lacks B-band O antigen, than for P. aeruginosa PAO1, while adhesion to organics is stronger in the wild-type strain. In separate studies, however, this research group observed that adhesion to silicon was stronger for strain PAO1 than for strain AK1401 (8), while adhesion to serum albumin was three times higher in the mutant (9). These conflicting results in comparing the adhesive strengths of wild-type and LPS variant strains might have been caused by the use of sample preparation techniques and testing environments that have not been standardized in the different studies (28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…This supports the general interpretation that the short-range single-bond force (f SR ) derived from Poisson analysis is due to AB forces, while LW and EDL forces contribute to the longrange force (F LR ), which is in line with most surface thermodynamic analyses of bacterial adhesion and with extended DLVO analyses (7, 9, 23, 28, 30). Although the single-bond forces derived from Poisson analysis are widely interpreted as hydrogen bonds (5,8,26,27), the typical rupture forces of a hydrogen bond are reportedly about 0.01 nN (19,20), orders of magnitude smaller than the f SR values in Table 1. On the other hand, ligand-receptor bonds, e.g., the streptavidin-biotin interaction, are reported to be on the order of 0.1 nN (4,16,24,25), which is comparable to the f SR values in Table 1 and suggests that multiple hydrogen bonds are involved in one ligand-receptor bond.…”
Section: Poisson Analysis Of Bacterial Adhesion Forcesmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Figure 1a shows an AFM force-distance curve for Staphylococcus epidermidis on glass with multiple peaks in the retraction curve. Considering each adhesion peak as an individual detachment event (2,5,8,10,26,27), each peak provides a specific adhesion force (F) according to equation 1, and the only variable for a given combination of bacterial strain and substratum is the number of short-range bonds (k). It should be noted that it is a tedious task to identify the minor peaks, since it is not clear a priori when a peak should be taken as an individual detachment event.…”
Section: Theoretical Background Of Poisson Analysis Of Adhesion Forcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations