2018
DOI: 10.1002/mds.27485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importance of low diagnostic Accuracy for early Parkinson's disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

5
72
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
5
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of early‐stage PD, reported in de novo patients, varies between 38% and 65% . Sixteen of our 21 ET patients had a second clinical diagnosis of PD, which was confirmed at autopsy in 10 (63%; Table ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of early‐stage PD, reported in de novo patients, varies between 38% and 65% . Sixteen of our 21 ET patients had a second clinical diagnosis of PD, which was confirmed at autopsy in 10 (63%; Table ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The most common error was a clinical diagnosis of PD in 5 patients who had PSP pathology. Similar errors have been reported by several other studies . The main reason for that is the absence of ophthalmoplegia and early gait difficulty .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations