2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2019.10.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importance of Flow in Risk Stratification of Aortic Stenosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering our findings together with previous data [ 6 ] and expert opinion [ 14 ], we would argue that a SVI threshold of 30 ml/m 2 may be more prognostically appropriate in those with severe low-gradient AS with preserved EF, especially in female patients and/or those with BMI > 30 kg/m 2 . SVI levels between 30 and 35 ml/m 2 are more likely to correspond with ‘normal’ physiology in the presence of relatively small LV size and/or exaggerated BSA in these patient populations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Considering our findings together with previous data [ 6 ] and expert opinion [ 14 ], we would argue that a SVI threshold of 30 ml/m 2 may be more prognostically appropriate in those with severe low-gradient AS with preserved EF, especially in female patients and/or those with BMI > 30 kg/m 2 . SVI levels between 30 and 35 ml/m 2 are more likely to correspond with ‘normal’ physiology in the presence of relatively small LV size and/or exaggerated BSA in these patient populations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…SVI is a measurement of left ventricular forward output; SVI < 35 ml/m 2 is accepted [ 2 ] to represent a state of reduced LV output, with SVI 25–30 ml/m 2 and SVI < 25 ml/m 2 representing moderately and severely reduced output, respectively [ 14 ]. In previous smaller studies, SVI ≤ 35 ml/m 2 has generally been associated with worse outcomes in adults with severe AS, either in those undergoing AVR or conservative management [ 7 , 17 - 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation