2007
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-90
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importance of data structure in comparing two dimension reduction methods for classification of microarray gene expression data

Abstract: Background: With the advance of microarray technology, several methods for gene classification and prognosis have been already designed. However, under various denominations, some of these methods have similar approaches. This study evaluates the influence of gene expression variance structure on the performance of methods that describe the relationship between gene expression levels and a given phenotype through projection of data onto discriminant axes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower-performance problem in between-class classification [ 7 ] is herein solved by taking advantage of the information embedded in the testing feature vector.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lower-performance problem in between-class classification [ 7 ] is herein solved by taking advantage of the information embedded in the testing feature vector.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can lead to a more complete understanding of molecular variations, in addition to morphologic variations among tumors. A large number of studies have used microarrays to analyze the gene expression for breast cancer, leukemia, colon tissue, and others, demonstrating the potential power of microarray in tumor classification [ 1 - 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparative study of major DR techniques can be seen in [92]. Linear techniques, such as principal component analysis (PCA) [36,44,142,160], linear discriminant analysis (LDA) [44], and multidimensional scaling (MDS) [146], are used in cases of linearly separable points in the feature space. These techniques assume Euclidean distance among the feature points.…”
Section: Histology Image Processing and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, to properly use conventional discriminant function analysis (DA), one must have more cases than variables, ideally by a factor of 10 or more. BGA (Dolédec and Chessel 1987) and DA are based on the same principle: find a linear combination of variables that defines a direction in the multidimensional space, along which maximizes the variance between groups (Truntzer et al 2007). However, BGA allows to cope with the limitation related to the number of cases as it can be used when the number of variables exceeds the number of cases (Culhane et al 2002).…”
Section: Between-group (Bga) Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%