2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-005-0146-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importance of D1 receptors for associative components of amphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization and conditioned activity: a study using D1 receptor knockout mice

Abstract: Repeatedly treating D(1)-deficient mice with AMPH appears to cause a general increase in responsivity. The reason for this hyper-responsivity is uncertain, but it is possible that cues from the testing environment were unable to inhibit responding (i.e., associative processes were disrupted). Alternatively, compensatory mechanisms (e.g., increases in D(2)-like receptors) may affect processes underlying sensitization and conditioned activity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cocaine and amphetamine, which exhibit primary effects via inhibition of the DAT and NET, do not increase activity in drd1 KO mice (Crawford et al, 1997;Miner et al, 1995), although conflicting reports exist (McDougall et al, 2005). In these studies, modafinil did not increase the activity in male dopamine drd1 receptor KO mice, nor rearing in female dopamine drd1 receptor KO mice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Cocaine and amphetamine, which exhibit primary effects via inhibition of the DAT and NET, do not increase activity in drd1 KO mice (Crawford et al, 1997;Miner et al, 1995), although conflicting reports exist (McDougall et al, 2005). In these studies, modafinil did not increase the activity in male dopamine drd1 receptor KO mice, nor rearing in female dopamine drd1 receptor KO mice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…When only a single pretreatment injection of cocaine is administered, qualitative differences between young and adult rats emerge. Specifically, adult rats and mice do not exhibit context-independent behavioral sensitization when cocaine is administered just once in the home cage (Drew and Glick 1989;Weiss et al 1989;Fontana et al 1993;Jackson and Nutt 1993;Battisti et al 1999Battisti et al , 2000McDougall et al 2005McDougall et al , 2007, whereas young rats show a robust sensitized response in the same circumstance (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…More specifically, rats given a single environment-cocaine pairing on PD 79 exhibited an elevated locomotor response when injected with saline in the same environmental context on PD 100. Such findings are not unique in the literature, because adult wild-type C57BL/6 mice show a strong conditioned locomotor response when tested 17 days after a single environment-amphetamine pairing (McDougall et al , 2005). An interesting effect often observed in drug-seeking tasks is called “incubation of drug craving,” in which cocaine-paired cues induce greater levels of instrumental responding at longer drug abstinence intervals (for reviews, see Lu et al , 2004; Pickens et al , 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%