2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2013.06.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importance of average litter weight and individual birth weight for early postnatal performance and myofiber characteristics of progeny

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Organ weights of offspring were within the normal range of newborn piglets [18, 32]. The tendency for an increased absolute STM weight in offspring from ARG sows suggests that, independent of IUC, l -arginine supplementation promotes muscle development of offspring, an observation that has to the best of the authors’ knowledge not been shown in previous studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Organ weights of offspring were within the normal range of newborn piglets [18, 32]. The tendency for an increased absolute STM weight in offspring from ARG sows suggests that, independent of IUC, l -arginine supplementation promotes muscle development of offspring, an observation that has to the best of the authors’ knowledge not been shown in previous studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The greater BtW and weight of STM and PM of offspring from OL sows compared with IN sows were foreseen as it has been reviewed extensively that there is a high correlation between large litter size and extent of crowding as well as greater within-litter variation of BtW and greater number of low BtW offspring [ 2 , 30 , 31 ]. Organ weights of offspring were within the normal range of newborn piglets [ 18 , 32 ]. The tendency for an increased absolute STM weight in offspring from ARG sows suggests that, independent of IUC, l -arginine supplementation promotes muscle development of offspring, an observation that has to the best of the authors’ knowledge not been shown in previous studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors found out that piglets with lower birth weight reach lower live weight at the time of weaning, 5 and 7 days after weaning and their fattening up to slaughter weight lasts longer. Pardo et al (2011) state that piglets with birth weight higher by 0.5 kg had weaning weight higher by 1.4 kg and slaughter weight by 12.2 kg on average. Rehfeldt et al (2008) say that growth intensity of piglets increases with higher birth weight of piglets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For breeders, the traits with substantial economical importance are number of piglets per litter, their weight and viability. If sows give large litters of piglets with higher birth weight and good viability, the losses of piglets decrase and due to faster growth the time necessary for fattening is shortened and profitability increases (Fix et al, 2010;Pardo et al, 2011). Beaulieu et al (2010) studied the effect of birth weight of piglets on their growth.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That observation was unexpected; however, this weight class is not a concern for the swine industry. Piglets weighing more than 1,600 are not considered low‐weight piglets and therefore generally do not suffer impairment on growing performance, as observed in low‐birthweight piglets (Pardo, Müller, Bérard, Kreuzer, & Bee, ). Lanferdini et al, () reported that piglets born weighing over 1,500 g do not have their performance influenced until marketed and do not have the physiological limitations and low efficiency observed in low‐birthweight piglets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%