1996
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-7484-5_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importance-driven Stochastic Ray Radiosity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The survival (or nonabsorption) probability on a patch has been usually considered equal to its reflectivity. An exception to this survival probability is found in [8], where the received importance was considered instead of the reflectivity. In [10] we find also a short discussion under the term of survival biasing (although the form factors were nondiscrete).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The survival (or nonabsorption) probability on a patch has been usually considered equal to its reflectivity. An exception to this survival probability is found in [8], where the received importance was considered instead of the reflectivity. In [10] we find also a short discussion under the term of survival biasing (although the form factors were nondiscrete).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…This is useful in a scene alike the one in Figure 1. This case can be considered the dual of the one given in [8].…”
Section: An Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we make the survival probability proportional to received importance, that is, i I i , V i , where the V i is the initial and I i the total importance [8], we will assure that the paths will survive in patches which are important to the selected ones. This could be used to drive a random walk in a scene alike the one in Figure 2, the dual of Figure 1.…”
Section: An Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations