2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-14721-0_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importance-Aware Genetic Programming for Automated Scheduling Heuristics Learning in Dynamic Flexible Job Shop Scheduling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A threshold value ( ) is then computed for penalizing the candidates in subsequent steps (line 4). After the previous initial steps, the survivors are chosen from the candidate set to create the new population through − 1 iterations (see lines [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. The algorithm categorizes the candidates into the penalized set ( ) and the non-penalized set ( ) at each iteration (line 6).…”
Section: A Novel Gp Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A threshold value ( ) is then computed for penalizing the candidates in subsequent steps (line 4). After the previous initial steps, the survivors are chosen from the candidate set to create the new population through − 1 iterations (see lines [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. The algorithm categorizes the candidates into the penalized set ( ) and the non-penalized set ( ) at each iteration (line 6).…”
Section: A Novel Gp Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, when evaluating the overall performance of each dispatching rules , the fitness function is calculated by Equation (12), where ( , ) is the value of scheduling objective, which is calculated by applying the rule to a training instance ∈ , ( ) denotes the target value, obtained by the reference rule in the same training instance. Due to the impressive results for minimizing the MT, MWT, MFT objectives, the Covert, WATC, PT+WINQ rules are adopted as reference rules, respectively [5,19].…”
Section: Discrete Event Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations