2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2012.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implicit visual learning and the expression of learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following Dienes (2014) we specified our roughly expected maximum effect-size if the hypothesis was true that both conditions differ. Based on the data of Experiment 3 in this paper and data from previous studies (Haider et al, 2011, 2012, 2014) we estimated that the maximum expected difference between the percent correct predictions in the BO- and the RO-Condition can reach 30% [presented as B H (0.30%) ]. With this estimated effect size the Bayes factor was B H (0.30%) = 0.02.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Following Dienes (2014) we specified our roughly expected maximum effect-size if the hypothesis was true that both conditions differ. Based on the data of Experiment 3 in this paper and data from previous studies (Haider et al, 2011, 2012, 2014) we estimated that the maximum expected difference between the percent correct predictions in the BO- and the RO-Condition can reach 30% [presented as B H (0.30%) ]. With this estimated effect size the Bayes factor was B H (0.30%) = 0.02.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In our version of the SRTT (Haider et al, 2012), a squared target stimulus appeared in the upper third of the screen. The target stimulus had a size of about 3 × 3 cm on a 17-inch screen and contained a picture of one of six different colored circles.…”
Section: General Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Haider and Frensch (1999), Wagner et al (2004), Gaschler et al (2013), Haider et al (2013), Dietrich and Haider (2015) have been pursuing the idea that during learning of skills there are such transitions. They used for example the number reduction task (Wagner et al, 2004).…”
Section: Stage 2: Coherence Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sudden drop in the solution time is detectable, which could not be explained by step-wise learning process. Haider et al (2013) postulated that after a large number of attempts implicit processes extract and detect the underlying regularity of the given sequences. This enters a processing shortcut resulting in a much higher process fluency.…”
Section: Stage 2: Coherence Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%