2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2014.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implicit theories and youth mental health problems: A random-effects meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
114
1
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
4
114
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…As initial support of this possibility, in past studies an entity theory of personality predicted greater self-reported stress and anxiety following ostracism, as well as greater reports of psychosocial stress (Yeager, Johnson, et al, 2014) and psychopathology (Miu & Yeager, 2015; Schleider, Abel, & Weisz, 2015). Furthermore, implicit theories of personality relate to negative self-conscious emotions such as shame (Yeager, Trzesniewski, Tirri, Nokelainen, & Dweck, 2011), and these self-conscious emotions co-occur with threat-type physiological reactions to social-evaluative stress (Dickerson & Kemeny, 2004).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…As initial support of this possibility, in past studies an entity theory of personality predicted greater self-reported stress and anxiety following ostracism, as well as greater reports of psychosocial stress (Yeager, Johnson, et al, 2014) and psychopathology (Miu & Yeager, 2015; Schleider, Abel, & Weisz, 2015). Furthermore, implicit theories of personality relate to negative self-conscious emotions such as shame (Yeager, Trzesniewski, Tirri, Nokelainen, & Dweck, 2011), and these self-conscious emotions co-occur with threat-type physiological reactions to social-evaluative stress (Dickerson & Kemeny, 2004).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…By providing an interpretative lens, they help shape judgments and reactions to life events and others’ behavior (Chiu, Hong, & Dweck, 1997; Yeager, Trzesniewski, Tirri, Nokelainen, & Dweck, 2011). Studies suggest that adolescents who believe people’s traits are fixed and unchangeable—that is, who have a fixed mindset of personality—are more likely than others to show helpless responses to social stress (Erdley, Cain, Loomis, Dumas-Hines, & Dweck, 1997; Yeager, Miu, Powers, & Dweck, 2013) and higher levels of mental health problems, both cross-sectionally (Schleider, Abel, & Weisz, 2015) and over time (Romero et al, 2014; Schleider & Weisz, in press). However, recent studies suggest that when adolescents are persuaded that people’s traits have the potential to change—that is, when they adopt a growth mindset of personality— they are less likely to show helplessness in response to social setbacks (Erdley et al, 1997).…”
Section: Modifying Mindsets: a Scalable Intervention Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, we tested whether a single-session intervention teaching growth mindset of personality, or the belief that one’s personality is malleable—as opposed to fixed personality mindset, or the belief that one’s personality is fixed and unchangeable (Dweck, 2008)—could reduce established risk factors for youth internalizing problems. Compared to growth mindsets, fixed mindsets of personal traits have demonstrated cross-sectional and prospective relations with higher levels of anxiety and depression in youths (Romero, Master, Paunesku, Dweck, & Gross, 2014; Schleider, Abel, & Weisz, 2015; Schleider & Weisz, in press). Further, in a recent study, a single-session growth personality mindset intervention reduced the development of depressive symptoms in a community sample of adolescents, supporting these theories as promising prevention targets—even when taught in an extremely brief format (Miu & Yeager, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C. Rogers believed that realizing the personal meaning of one's own behavior is a condition for psychologically healthy development. Thereby, according to our approach, the driving force of personal development is considered to be the development of value and meaning systems that serve as the sources of personal behavior (Francis, & Crea, 2015;Schleider, Abel, & Weisz, 2015;Malkina-Pykh, & Pykh, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%