2021
DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implicit racism, colour blindness, and narrow definitions of discrimination: Why some White people prefer ‘All Lives Matter’ to ‘Black Lives Matter’

Abstract: The Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement has been called the 'civil rights issue of our time' (Holt & Sweitzer, 2020, Self and Identity, 19(, p. 16) but the All Lives Matter (ALM) movement swiftly emerged as an oppositional response to BLM. Prior research has investigated some predictors of support for ALM over BLM, but these predictors have thus far not included levels of racial bias or potentially relevant constructions of racism. This pre-registered, cross-sectional study (N = 287) tested the degree to which W… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
(131 reference statements)
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using techniques of statistical regression, they show that support for ALM is predicted by 3 sets of variables: implicit anti-Black racism, endorsing colour-blind ideologies that downplayed racial inequalities, and narrow definitions of racism implying that racism is ascribed only in exceptional cases. For West et al (2021), this set of findings means that implicit anti-Black racism and downplaying the extent of anti-Black racism contribute to support for ALM, rather than any inclusive position. Further, it becomes easier for White individuals to justify support for ALM without expressly disagreeing with the cause of BLM: Support for ALM can instead be recast as in line with the status quo, which does not treat racism as a pressing concern.…”
Section: Resistance To Mobilizing Racementioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Using techniques of statistical regression, they show that support for ALM is predicted by 3 sets of variables: implicit anti-Black racism, endorsing colour-blind ideologies that downplayed racial inequalities, and narrow definitions of racism implying that racism is ascribed only in exceptional cases. For West et al (2021), this set of findings means that implicit anti-Black racism and downplaying the extent of anti-Black racism contribute to support for ALM, rather than any inclusive position. Further, it becomes easier for White individuals to justify support for ALM without expressly disagreeing with the cause of BLM: Support for ALM can instead be recast as in line with the status quo, which does not treat racism as a pressing concern.…”
Section: Resistance To Mobilizing Racementioning
confidence: 96%
“…For participants, making race an explicit part of official and public life in Sweden meant bringing to fore the racism in Swedish society. As in West et al.’s (2021) paper, resistance to making race a more relevant part of social life involved contending with implications of racism.…”
Section: Resistance To Mobilizing Racementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations