2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.06.067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implicit numerical schemes for generalized heat conduction equations

Abstract: There are various situations where the classical Fourier's law for heat conduction is not applicable, such as heat conduction in heterogeneous materials [1,2] or for modeling low-temperature phenomena [3,4,5]. In such cases, heat flux is not directly proportional to temperature gradient, hence, the role -and both the analytical and numerical treatment -of boundary conditions becomes nontrivial. Here, we address this question for finite difference numerics via a shifted field approach. Based on this ground, imp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where is mass density (constant in the small-strain approximation), (1) tells how the spatial derivative of stress σ determines the time derivative of the velocity field v (volumetric force density being omitted 1 Hence, there is no need to distinguish between Lagrangian and Eulerian variables, and between material manifold vectors/covectors/tensors/. .…”
Section: Properties Of the Continuum Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where is mass density (constant in the small-strain approximation), (1) tells how the spatial derivative of stress σ determines the time derivative of the velocity field v (volumetric force density being omitted 1 Hence, there is no need to distinguish between Lagrangian and Eulerian variables, and between material manifold vectors/covectors/tensors/. .…”
Section: Properties Of the Continuum Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods that were born with reversibility in mind may apparently fail for a nonreversible problem. For example, a finite element software is able to provide, at the expense of large run time, quantitatively and even qualitatively wrong outcome while a simple finite difference scheme solves the same problem fast and precisely [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The non-dimensional model (19)- (25) is numerically solved using a semi-implicit finite difference method on a staggered grid [57]. The transformations ξ = r/R(t) and η = (r − R(t))/(1 − R(t)) are used to map the evolving domains 0 < r < R(t) and R(t) < r < 1 to stationary domains 0 < η, ξ < 1, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In time, Theqrefore the difference equations are only an explicit forward differencing scheme is used. Figure 1: Concept of the spatial discretization [39].…”
Section: Difference Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is successfully applied in the evaluation of room temperature experiments as well [37,38]. Moreover, due to the nonlocal term, its numerical solution required a particular spatial discretization to embed the boundary conditions appropriately [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%