2019
DOI: 10.1016/s1003-6326(19)65145-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implicit modeling of complex orebody with constraints of geological rules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The appropriate combination operations or modeling sequence should be specified according to the corresponding geological rule. The RBF-based methods were implemented to interpolate the raw drillhole data [40] and the user-defined contour data [41] for each sub-field. Several examples of orebody implicit modeling were studied to analyze the combination constraints of multiple fields.…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The appropriate combination operations or modeling sequence should be specified according to the corresponding geological rule. The RBF-based methods were implemented to interpolate the raw drillhole data [40] and the user-defined contour data [41] for each sub-field. Several examples of orebody implicit modeling were studied to analyze the combination constraints of multiple fields.…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main ideas of the implicit modeling method [33] of ore body based on geological sampling data are as follows. First, the method uses discretization to convert corresponding types of geological data into interpolation constraints at a certain sampling interval.…”
Section: Implicit Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of data support in the sparse domain makes it difficult to reconstruct the continuous trend between contours. Sim- ilar to the GRBF interpolant [5], besides constructing the constraints automatically, some interactive constraints can be appended to change the interpolation trend manually, as shown in Figure 3. These user inputs guide the interpolant toward more satisfactory results in different applications.…”
Section: Interactive Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many applications for the RBF-based methods with extended constraints in surface reconstruction. Similar to the generalized radial basis functions interpolant (GRBF), based on the interpolation constraints, some interactive constraints [5], including the trend line and the constraint line, can be constructed to control the local trend of shape interactively. It is useful when the method interpolates sparse data that satisfies all the constraints but exhibits an undesirable trend of shape.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation