1993
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.19.4.747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implicit memory: Effects of network size and interconnectivity on cued recall.

Abstract: Previous findings have indicated that the recall of a recently studied word is affected by how many associates it has in long-term memory (set size). The purpose of these experiments was to determine whether recall is also affected by the connectivity of these associates. Studied words were preselected to represent combinations of set size and connectivity and, in different experiments, recall was cued with extralist or intralist cues and with cues sharing few or many associates with the studied words. Effects… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
102
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(82 reference statements)
7
102
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Small set size words were recalled more often than large set size words. However, it did not reveal the same pattern of recall with respect to connectivity shown by Nelson et al (1993). Words of lower connectivity were recalled higher than words of higher connectivity.…”
Section: Word Association Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Small set size words were recalled more often than large set size words. However, it did not reveal the same pattern of recall with respect to connectivity shown by Nelson et al (1993). Words of lower connectivity were recalled higher than words of higher connectivity.…”
Section: Word Association Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…According to Nelson et al (1993), highly connective words are recalled more due to a stronger surge of activation surrounding the target word. The findings of our study challenge this theoretical explanation for the greater prevalence of highly connective words being recalled, as well as Nelson et al's perception of connectivity.…”
Section: Word Association Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all connectionist models of associative memory, words are represented as networks of interconnected nodes. Early so-called localist connectionist models assumed one-to-one representation between a word and a node (Nelson et al 1993). By contrast, distributed models of representation are now viewed as more cognitively and biologically plausible: instead of one word being represented by one node, various aspects of words (e.g., orthographic, semantic, phonological) are each represented by corresponding sets of nodes.…”
Section: A Connectionist Model Of Disturbed Associations In Schizophrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nestor et al (1998) used a cued-recall word paradigm and norms derived from Nelson to attempt to identify the cognitive dynamics underlying schizophrenic associative disturbance. Schizophrenic patients and comparison subjects studied a list of to-be-remembered target words, and then were given a cued recall test in which both word targets and cues were equal in terms of connectivity and network size, as measured by the quantitative normative studies of Nelson et al (1992Nelson et al ( , 1993. These studies used the number of associates of a word to determine its network size and the degree of association both among these associates and between the target word and its associates to determine its network connectivity.…”
Section: A Connectionist Model Of Disturbed Associations In Schizophrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Words and their corresponding nodes are assumed to be organized into networks, which may differ in size, as in number of associates, and in the strength of connections linking these associates. Activation spreads as a function of both size and associative strength of a network, with maximum activation and, hence, better recall for words of small, highly connected networks (Nelson et al, 1993). Connectionist models thus allow for the novel examination of how size and connectivity of word networks govern activation spread in associative memory of schizophrenia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%