2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.03.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implicit mechanisms of intention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, several studies have investigated potential relations between the timing of neural precursors of voluntary action, such as the RP, and W-Time. However, to our knowledge, none have ever been found [44][45][46]64 . Third, W-time seems to suffer from order effects and may be reported before movement solely due to task demands 65 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Second, several studies have investigated potential relations between the timing of neural precursors of voluntary action, such as the RP, and W-Time. However, to our knowledge, none have ever been found [44][45][46]64 . Third, W-time seems to suffer from order effects and may be reported before movement solely due to task demands 65 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…As previous studies have shown that dopamine excitation drives behavior (Olds & Milner 1956;Corbett & Wise 1980;Tsai et al 2009), our data would suggest that the dopamine response to the fractals may be instrumental for generating useful bids; only a small population of neurons (10 -20) would be necessary for this effect. However, while the shuffled data resulted in an accuracy of 0%, the accuracy of 60% with the SVR is much smaller than the 80 -90% accuracy achieved with binary decoders such as nearest neighbor, linear SVM and discriminant analysis classifiers (Quiroga et al 2006;Grabenhorst et al 2012;Chang & Tsao 2017;Pastor-Bernier et al 2019;Koren 2021;Aflalo et al 2022). A possible explanation for the lower accuracy of SVR as compared to a binary classifier may lie in the continuous nature of the SVR, and that accuracy is possibly further reduced due to binning the bids necessitated by our limited number of trials per bid.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The external stimuli are known to elicit neuronal signals for subjectively weighted reward amounts, called utility (Stauffer et al 2014), but we do not know whether these neuronal signals simply reflect the external stimulus indicating the subjective reward value or represent the internal subjective value elicited by the stimulus. Neuronal signals for internal processes exist in human sensory association cortex where spontaneous musical tunes and imagined speech are associated with neuronal activities that can drive melodies on pianos and speech on synthesizers (Aflalo et al 2022; Wandelt et al 2022). The suggestion of internal signals in the absence of outside sensory events or motor acts prompts the question whether reward neurons may carry analogous signals for internal subjective reward value distinct from externally imposed reward information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They believed that stimulating the DLPFC can strengthen thalamocortical and cortico-cortical connections and improve behavioral performance, EEG power spectrum, and estradiol levels, particularly in patients in MCS ( 13 20 ). However, according to Integrated Information Theory (IIT), consciousness is connected primarily with the posterior cortical areas ( 21 ), of which the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) has been demonstrated as the most critical consciousness-associative cortical region ( 22 ). It includes the superior marginal gyrus, the angular gyrus, and the precuneus, and it plays a key role in sensory and motor integration and is involved in various cognitive functions ( 23 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%