2021
DOI: 10.3390/ijgi10050330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implicit, Formal, and Powerful Semantics in Geoinformation

Abstract: Distinct, alternative forms of geosemantics, whose classification is often ill-defined, emerge in the management of geospatial information. This paper proposes a workflow to identify patterns in the different practices and methods dealing with geoinformation. From a meta-review of the state of the art in geosemantics, this paper first pinpoints “keywords” representing key concepts, challenges, methods, and technologies. Then, we illustrate several case studies, following the categorization into implicit, forma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 152 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The news reports were processed by clauses, and then the sentences were read manually to extract the news content. The concepts, relationships, and rules of typhoon events were derived from various sources, including standard specifications, laws, and regulations (e.g., the Meteorological Disaster Prevention Ordinance), professional books (e.g., Typhoon Forecast and Disaster), literature [21,35,37,39,46,47,49,50,52,68,69], official news, and statistical data materials (e.g., Tropical Cyclone Yearbook) about typhoons. For instance, the Chinese standard document 'GB/T 19201-2006' defines the level of tropical cyclones; 'GB/T 26376-2010' defines basic terms for natural disaster management; 'GB/T 28921-2012' defines the categories of natural disasters, and 'GB/T 35663-2017' defines the terms and definitions of weather conditions, meteorological elements and weather phenomena.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The news reports were processed by clauses, and then the sentences were read manually to extract the news content. The concepts, relationships, and rules of typhoon events were derived from various sources, including standard specifications, laws, and regulations (e.g., the Meteorological Disaster Prevention Ordinance), professional books (e.g., Typhoon Forecast and Disaster), literature [21,35,37,39,46,47,49,50,52,68,69], official news, and statistical data materials (e.g., Tropical Cyclone Yearbook) about typhoons. For instance, the Chinese standard document 'GB/T 19201-2006' defines the level of tropical cyclones; 'GB/T 26376-2010' defines basic terms for natural disaster management; 'GB/T 28921-2012' defines the categories of natural disasters, and 'GB/T 35663-2017' defines the terms and definitions of weather conditions, meteorological elements and weather phenomena.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this issue, and to maintain semantic interoperability of such less strict schematization, it is highly recommended the use of URIs instead of simple texts for linking measurement types, values and units to internationally acknowledged controlled vocabularies and thesauri (OBIS, 2021). Please refer to Bordogna et al (2021) for an updated account of perspectives on semantics in geo-based information.…”
Section: Addressing Global Reporting Needsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a large body of literature on geospatial cognition, ranging from behavior geography and mental representation to language descriptions of geospaces [28][29][30][31][32]. Research on the formal modeling of geographic concepts includes geographical ontology, digital gazetteers, geographical information retrieval and linked data [33][34][35][36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Geospatial Semanticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work on geospatial semantics has focused on eliciting semantic information from semi-structured and unstructured resources [17,34,39]. The semantics of a place or a geospatial entity not only originate from its natural attributes, but also from human activities in the place.…”
Section: Geospatial Semanticsmentioning
confidence: 99%