2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apnum.2019.04.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implicit-explicit methods for a class of nonlinear nonlocal gradient flow equations modelling collective behaviour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, strong stability preserving (SSP) explicit RK schemes are a popular class of time integrators associated with a favorable stability constraint on the time step ∆t [25][26][27][28][29][33][34][35]. Alternatively, once could employ implicit-explicit Runge-Kutta (IMEX-RK) methods (see [33][34][35]), for which only the diffusion term is treated implicitly. In this case the stability condition on ∆t is less restrictive than for explicit discretizations, but a large system of nonlinear algebraic equations must be solved in each time step.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, strong stability preserving (SSP) explicit RK schemes are a popular class of time integrators associated with a favorable stability constraint on the time step ∆t [25][26][27][28][29][33][34][35]. Alternatively, once could employ implicit-explicit Runge-Kutta (IMEX-RK) methods (see [33][34][35]), for which only the diffusion term is treated implicitly. In this case the stability condition on ∆t is less restrictive than for explicit discretizations, but a large system of nonlinear algebraic equations must be solved in each time step.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, IMEX methods are more general than semi-implicit methods and are based on interlacing evaluations of the stages of particular explicit and implicit Runge-Kutta (RK) schemes [21,22]. We refer to [23,24] as the earliest references to IMEX methods in the context of time-dependent partial differential equations and [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] for various applications of IMEX-RK schemes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Explicit numerical schemes for (1) on a uniform Cartesian grid of meshwidth ∆x and time step ∆t are easy to implement but are associated with a Courant-Friedrichs-Lewy (CFL) stability condition [2] that imposes the proportionality ∆t ≈ ∆x 2 [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. This restriction makes long-term simulations of ( 1)-( 3) on a uniform grid unacceptably slow.…”
Section: Scopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strong Stability Preserving (SSP) explicit Runge-Kutta methods are a popular class of time integrators whose use leads to a stronger stability constraint on ∆t, see [3][4][5][6][9][10][11]13]. An alternative to explicit RK schemes are implicit-explicit Runge-Kutta (IMEX-RK) methods (see [9][10][11]), for which only the diffusion term is treated implicitly. In this case the stability condition on ∆t is less severe than for explicit RK schemes, but a large number of nonlinear systems need to be solved.…”
Section: Notation and Semi-discrete Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several works have devoted to the efficient numerical methods for the treatment of nonlinear problems in recent years. For example, we can refer to the Euler implicit–explicit methods (Bürger et al , 2019; Giacomo and Lorenzo, 2013; He, 2013), the Newton scheme (Durango and Novo, 2018; Liu et al , 2012; Oliver et al , 2011) and the Oseen method (An, 2014; Shang, 2018). The main motivation of designing these numerical schemes is to provide a rapid and efficient mean of solving the considered problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%