2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.08.14.251686
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implicit anticipation of probabilistic regularities: Larger CNV emerges for unpredictable events

Abstract: Anticipation of upcoming events plays a crucial role in automatic behaviors. It is, however, still unclear whether the event-related brain potential (ERP) markers of anticipation could track the implicit acquisition of probabilistic regularities that can be considered as building blocks of automatic behaviors. Therefore, in a four-choice reaction time (RT) task performed by young adults (N = 36), the contingent negative variation (CNV) as an ERP marker of anticipation was measured from the onset of an uninform… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This very rapid learning has been observed in previous SRT experiments (Kóbor et al, 2018;Simor et al, 2019), however, one should not conclude that representations of probabilities could not have changed (e.g. to a more complex trigram/second order model) if the experiment had been longer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…This very rapid learning has been observed in previous SRT experiments (Kóbor et al, 2018;Simor et al, 2019), however, one should not conclude that representations of probabilities could not have changed (e.g. to a more complex trigram/second order model) if the experiment had been longer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…When the triplet-level structure is considered in the task, the distributional and transitional probability characteristics of triplets completely overlap (Kóbor et al, 2018;Szegedi-Hallgató, Janacsek, & Nemeth, 2019;Szegedi-Hallgató et al, 2017). This means that the above-described frequency or occurrence probability of the triplets is the same as the probability to which the third trials of the triplets are predictable (second-order non-adjacent dependency).…”
Section: Experimental Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[p = 1/(maximum -pumps+1)] Specific parameters to the probability of explosion (i) No burst during the first or the first two inflations (Kóbor et al, 2015;Kardos et al, 2016;Sehrig et al, 2019Sehrig et al, , 2020, or (ii) a minimum number of pumps before cash out (Claus and Hutchison, 2012). Burst during the first pump…”
Section: Uniform Probability Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in 10 studies (5 fMRI, 10 EEG), no burst could occur during the first pump (Dir et al, 2019(Dir et al, , 2020Gentili et al, 2020;Petropoulos Petalas et al, 2020) or the first two pumps (Chiu et al, 2012;Kóbor et al, 2015;Kardos et al, 2016;McCormick and Telzer, 2017b;Sehrig et al, 2019Sehrig et al, , 2020. In addition, three fMRI paradigm included a minimum number of pumps for each balloon (2-5 pumps) in the active mode before cash out to ensure that the participant tried to earn this minimum (Claus and Hutchison, 2012;McCormick and Telzer, 2017a;Claus et al, 2018).…”
Section: The Explosion Probabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%