2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implicit and explicit drinking identity predict latent classes that differ on the basis of college students’ drinking behaviors

Abstract: Background The purpose of this study was to identify distinct classes of college students on the basis of recent and past drinking behaviors and evaluate how implicit and explicit measures of drinking identity predict membership in these classes. Methods US undergraduate students (N = 456) completed online implicit (Implicit Association Test) and explicit (self-report) measures of drinking identity and assessments of drinking behaviors, including past month drinking, at-risk drinking in the past year, and li… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, application of latent class models to substance abuse risk and treatment have revealed some interesting outcomes regarding how patterns of use may impact substance use behaviors or brain activity [e.g., Refs. (167169)] and support the appropriateness of these methods in the context of SUD liability pathways.…”
Section: Methodological Approaches To Distinguish Trajectoriesmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Nonetheless, application of latent class models to substance abuse risk and treatment have revealed some interesting outcomes regarding how patterns of use may impact substance use behaviors or brain activity [e.g., Refs. (167169)] and support the appropriateness of these methods in the context of SUD liability pathways.…”
Section: Methodological Approaches To Distinguish Trajectoriesmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Several measures of drinking identity have been derived from implicit measures of identity (i.e., Implicit Associations Tests; Lindgren, Neighbors, et al, 2013; Montes et al, 2018), which use reaction time measures and avoid/approach tasks to stimuli, such as “drinker,” “nondrinker,” “me,” and “not me” (see Lindgren, Neighbors, et al, 2013). Explicit measures of drinking identity use semantic differential questioning assessing the basics of drinkers’ self-concepts (i.e., “Drinking is a part of who I am”; Lindgren, Neighbors, et al, 2013; Montes et al, 2018; Ramirez et al, 2017). Some of these scales have been adapted from other assessments, for example, the Alcohol Self-Concept Scale developed by Lindgren, Neighbors, et al (2013) was adapted from the Smoking Self-Concept Scale developed by Shadel & Mermelstein (1996).…”
Section: Protective Behavioral Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several important takeaways from these results. Strongly associating drinking, particularly overconsumption, with one’s identity is associated with higher risk of alcohol-related consequences (Ramirez et al, 2017). Present findings imply that the inverse is also true, that a safe or responsible drinking identity, as assessed by the PARDI, is predictive of fewer adverse alcohol-related outcomes.…”
Section: Broader Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current study examines the correlation between negative events such as exam failure and subtypes of psychological state among undergraduate nursing students via individually-oriented analyses [7], in order to identify "latent classes" or consistent patterns of psychological coping towards exam failure across individuals. This type of study is the rst of its type that has been conducted in China, and provides a reference point for comparison with future international studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%