2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1146-609x(02)01149-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implications of waterbird ecology for the dispersal of aquatic organisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
186
2
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(196 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
3
186
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Also worth noting is the change in the physical structure of the lagoon verge, from the open P. australis beds to the dense stands of S. densiflora which could impede the use of the lagoon banks by some waterbird species. The reduction in available space for the saltmarsh bulrush Scirpus maritimus, whose seeds are an important food source for many waterfowl (Green et al 2002), could also have significant impact on the size of the duck population that this wetland can support.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also worth noting is the change in the physical structure of the lagoon verge, from the open P. australis beds to the dense stands of S. densiflora which could impede the use of the lagoon banks by some waterbird species. The reduction in available space for the saltmarsh bulrush Scirpus maritimus, whose seeds are an important food source for many waterfowl (Green et al 2002), could also have significant impact on the size of the duck population that this wetland can support.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, for charophytes, wind dispersal may play a role as spores are very light and generally easily dispersed by the wind. Propagules of aquatic macrophytes are also dispersed by waterfowl, fish and invertebrates (Green et al, 2002;Charalambidou & Santamaria, 2005;Brochet et al, 2010;Figuerola et al, 2010;Pollux, 2011). Especially the smaller-sized propagules are more likely to survive the gut passage in birds feeding on them and germinate afterwards (Soons et al, 2008).…”
Section: Dispersal Of Propagulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, dispersal via animals provides macrophyte species with an opportunity to disperse over long distances, stretching up to 3000 km (Soons et al, 2008). Genetic analyses support the exchange of propagules among distant and upstream populations (Green et al, 2002;Pollux et al, 2009). Therefore, dispersal is a powerful mode for the submerged macrophytes to return to the restored water bodies.…”
Section: Dispersal Of Propagulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An often proposed natural mechanism for long-distance dispersal of aquatic invertebrates is hitch-hiking on the legs or plumage of, or via endozoochorous dispersal through, water birds (Charalambidou and Santamaría 2002;Green et al 2002;Frisch et al 2007;Rachalewski et al 2013). Experimental work by Rachalewski et al (2013) presented the possibility of Crangonyx amphipods hitchhiking on the legs or plumage of mallards; however, this was only for very restricted periods (less than 6 min) and a maximum flight distance of approximately 7 km.…”
Section: Introductions and Long-distance Dispersalsmentioning
confidence: 99%