Implications of the Cosmic Background Imager Polarization Data

Abstract

We present new measurements of the power spectra of the E-mode of CMB polarization, the temperature T, the cross-correlation of E and T, and upper limits on the B-mode from 2.5 years of dedicated Cosmic Background Imager (CBI) observations. Both raw maps and optimal signal images in the uv-plane and real space show strong detections of the E-mode (11.7 sigma for the EE power spectrum overall) and no detection of the B-mode. The power spectra are used to constrain parameters of the flat tilted adiabatic Lambda-CDM models: those determined from EE and TE bandpowers agree with those from TT, a powerful consistency check. There is little tolerance for shifting polarization peaks from the TT-forecast locations, as measured by the angular sound crossing scale theta = 100 ell_s = 1.03 +/- 0.02 from EE and TE cf. 1.044 +/- 0.005 with the TT data included. The scope for extra out-of-phase peaks from subdominant isocurvature modes is also curtailed. The EE and TE measurements of CBI, DASI and BOOMERANG are mutually consistent, and, taken together rather than singly, give enhanced leverage for these tests.Comment: 15 pages, 9 figures, submitted to ApJ -- Accepted version. The fine-bin spectrum, covariance matrix, and window functions are now available on the web (suitable for use in COSMOMC) at: http://www.astro.caltech.edu/~tjp/CBI/data2006/index.html The pipeline in the previous version inadvertently omitted one antenna, so the new spectrum contains ~15% more data. We emphasize that previous results were in no way biased, and that the (small) changes to the spectrum solely reflect the inclusion of the additional data. Numbers and figures in the paper have been updated correspondingly. All maps now have color bar

CMB constraints on a stochastic background of primordial magnetic fields

“…[23] agree that LSS data add very little to CMB current constraints, when only linear scales are correctly included: we obtain analogous results either with SDSS DR4 [34] or 2dF [35], without changing the CMB constraints in Table I. Another difference might be in the use of CBI data [33] in [22], whose foreground contamination at high ℓ has been stressed in Ref. [27]: we believe that the difference might be due to either methodology and/or to the different use of CMB data.…”

A CMB B-mode Search with Three Years of BICEP Observations

“…The Bicep focal plane consists of 49 pairs of feedhorn-coupled polarization-sensitive bolometers (PSB), as shown in Figure 3. Orthogonal absorbers are each coupled to a neutron transmutation doped (NTD) Germanium bolometer and the two temperature 64 C. Bischoff Sievers et al (2007), and Montroy et al (2006). The E-mode spectrum has been detected at high signal-to-noise by many experiments, but only upper limits exist for the B-mode spectrum.…”

Application of Bayesian model averaging to measurements of the primordial power spectrum

“…In this analysis we used measurements of the CMB temperature and polarization power spectra from both the WMAP 5 yr [2] and 7 yr [3] releases, to explore how WMAP has improved in its ability to distinguish between different models of the primordial power spectrum. A compilation of WMAP 7 yr and ground-based CMB experiments (Arcminute Cosmology Bolometer Array Receiver [18], Cosmic Background Imager [19], and BOOMERanG [20]), along with the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 7 [21] measurements of the galaxy clustering power spectrum, was also studied.…”