2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.11.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implications of Serum Bone Turnover Markers in Prostate Cancer Patients With Bone Metastasis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Searching for effective and sensitive serum indicators is important, as prostate cancer patients may present bone pain or pathological fracture. Gleason score ≥ 8, PSA ≥ 20 mg/L, and ALP elevation are risk factors for prostate cancer bone metastases (Kamiya et al, 2010;Moslehi et al, 2013). Bone metastases destroy the balance between osteoblast-mediated bone formation and osteoclast-mediated bone resorption .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Searching for effective and sensitive serum indicators is important, as prostate cancer patients may present bone pain or pathological fracture. Gleason score ≥ 8, PSA ≥ 20 mg/L, and ALP elevation are risk factors for prostate cancer bone metastases (Kamiya et al, 2010;Moslehi et al, 2013). Bone metastases destroy the balance between osteoblast-mediated bone formation and osteoclast-mediated bone resorption .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A combination of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase, alkaline phosphatase and PSA can obviate the need for a bone scan in 70% of cases [20]. In addition, Kamiya et al [21] reported that serum carboxyterminal pyridinoline cross-linked telopeptide parts of type-I collagen level was a more reliable marker than the others used to detect BM spread and to predict survival probability in PCa patients with BM. These serum markers are candidates to be incorporated to optimize our model in future studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies analyze the influence of bone metastases of different tumors on bone formation and resorption markers. Jung et al [10] and Kamiya et al [18] find significantly elevated concentrations of different bone formation and resorption markers in case of bone metastases. The results of Halleen et al [11], Lyubimova et al [13], Chao et al [14],and Yao et al [15] show promising findings regarding the bone resorption marker TRACP 5b in the question of bone metastases.…”
Section: Bone Trap Assaymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…One approach is the analysis of bone formation and resorption markers, generated in processes of the bone metabolism [10,11,16,18]. Numerous studies analyze the influence of bone metastases of different tumors on bone formation and resorption markers.…”
Section: Bone Trap Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%