2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3932(03)00029-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implications of rational inattention

Abstract: Abstract. A constraint that actions can depend on observations only through a communication channel with finite Shannon capacity is shown to be able to play a role very similar to that of a signal extraction problem or an adjustment cost in standard control problems. The resulting theory looks enough like familiar dynamic rational expectations theories to suggest that it might be useful and practical, while the implications for policy are different enough to be interesting.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

71
2,089
7
24

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,910 publications
(2,297 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
71
2,089
7
24
Order By: Relevance
“…"Rational inattention" theory, as proposed by Sims (1998Sims ( , 2003Sims ( , 2006, rationalizes the choice behaviour of decision-makers who choose their preferred amount of information and allocation of attention, when all options and information pertaining to them are fully available, but attending to and processing this information is costly (i.e. information frictions).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…"Rational inattention" theory, as proposed by Sims (1998Sims ( , 2003Sims ( , 2006, rationalizes the choice behaviour of decision-makers who choose their preferred amount of information and allocation of attention, when all options and information pertaining to them are fully available, but attending to and processing this information is costly (i.e. information frictions).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the works of Sims (1998Sims ( , 2003Sims ( , 2006, the rational inattention literature assumes that customers process information through channels with limited capacity. Accordingly, the cost of information is given by C(F ) = λκ, where λ is the unit cost of acquiring and processing information that the customer deems useful (simply referred to as cost of information hereon), and κ is the amount of information processed.…”
Section: Customer Choice Under Limited Attentionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The AMF method also has some of the flavor of the rational inattention concept of Mankiw and Reis (2002) and Sims (2003) who justify relaxing the information burden of rational expectations on the grounds that agents update their information infre-quently and agents have limited information-processing capacity. We use this type of assumption in the AMF method in order to streamline computation time.…”
Section: Relax Rational Expectations: Alternate Model Forecastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Em razão destes problemas, vários autores têm proposto o relaxamento de algumas premissas da HER ou, até mesmo, alternativas radicalmente diferentes no tratamento de expectativas nos modelos econômicos. Calvo (1983), Ball (2000), Sims (2001), Mankiw & Reis (2001), Calvo et al (2003), Woodford (2003), por exemplo, relaxam a premissa de informação perfeita. Alternativas mais radicais desvinculam a relação rígida entre modelo e expectativas dos agentes (Carroll, 2003;Frydman & Goldberg, 2003).…”
Section: Expectativas Racionaisunclassified