2017
DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.4140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implications of prostate-specific antigen screening guidelines on clinical practice at a Canadian regional community hospital

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Men aged 40 years or older with a family history of prostate cancer, • Men racially at risk of prostate cancer, such as African-Canadians, • Men aged 50 to 75 years old (who have a life expectancy of at least 10 years or more, however, Ontario guidelines do not recommended PSA screening for men over 75 years) and, • Men at any age who have a physician willing to screen him, but must pay a fee (Webster, Lau, & Newell, 2017).…”
Section: Author Notementioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Men aged 40 years or older with a family history of prostate cancer, • Men racially at risk of prostate cancer, such as African-Canadians, • Men aged 50 to 75 years old (who have a life expectancy of at least 10 years or more, however, Ontario guidelines do not recommended PSA screening for men over 75 years) and, • Men at any age who have a physician willing to screen him, but must pay a fee (Webster, Lau, & Newell, 2017).…”
Section: Author Notementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Webster et al, in a recent issue of CUAJ, nicely illustrates one region's experiences on PSA use and its impact of early diagnosis in a relatively captured/stable market in Ontario. 4 Several observational and modelling studies have quantified something we all seem to have witnessed over the last few years: decreased incidence of prostate cancer with a subsequent stage migration and PSA screening: Time to overcome our brand confusion EDITORIAL more metastatic disease in our clinics. In a recent turnabout this spring, the USPSTF has subsequently issued a new draft revision for prostate cancer screening upgrading its recommendation back to a C, encouraging physicians to discuss with their patients whether or not early prostate cancer detection is appropriate for them.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%