2020
DOI: 10.9734/ajee/2020/v13i330181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implications of Philately in Promoting the Protected Natural Areas (III): Cozia National Park

Abstract: Romania is a blessed place with many areas of unique beauty - as part of the natural heritage - with places where the spectacle of nature delights your eyes and take your breath with every step. Constantly promoting philatelic themes that use natural wealth and the beauty of our country as subjects, the administrative entity (with various names over time) responsible for issuing postage stamps performs a series of postage stamps in whose images are found rarities of flora and fauna, a miracle of nature. To sho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

6
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The documentation for this paper started, from our concerns for ecology, for the management of protected areas, and because we love ecosystems, as well as the biodiversity that populates them [8][9][10]. Having at hand a series of extremely relevant studies at the international, and less national level [11][12][13], in terms of both protected area management and biodiversity, we decided to extrapolate these approaches to the wider area of ecosystems in Romania.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The documentation for this paper started, from our concerns for ecology, for the management of protected areas, and because we love ecosystems, as well as the biodiversity that populates them [8][9][10]. Having at hand a series of extremely relevant studies at the international, and less national level [11][12][13], in terms of both protected area management and biodiversity, we decided to extrapolate these approaches to the wider area of ecosystems in Romania.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The documentation for this paper started from our concerns for environmental philosophy and applied ecology [5], for the management of protected areas [6], and because we love the implications of thematic philately in ecosystem promotion and biodiversity conservation strategies [7][8][9][10][11][12]. Having at hand a series of relevant publications, in terms of management of protected areas and biodiversity [13][14][15], and some relevant philatelic publications [16][17][18][19], we decided to extrapolate these approaches to the limited space of Romanian ecosystems, where hunting is a well-defined activity, still in the foreground.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The documentation for the realization of this paper started from our concerns for ecology and the management of protected areas [6][7][8]. Having at hand a series of relevant studies at the national level [9][10][11], regarding the management of protected areas, as well as biodiversity, we decided to continue exposing the relationship between Romanian philately and WWF, practically the fourth official collaboration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent history of Romania, between 1977 and 2006, records the construction of a special philately, in terms of the pieces made, with the otherwise considerable contribution of the WWF [5]. In Romania, thematic philately under the influence of WWF has thus managed to manifest itself as a civilized way of respecting habitats, as well as an activity designed to promote the sustainable balance between the environment and community [6]. This balance must also exist with the various species of birds that populate specific ecosystems, the appearance of the 2006 philatelic issue being an important step in consolidating and appreciating the humanenvironment relationship.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%