2011
DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2012735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implications of Objective vs Subjective Delirium Assessment in Surgical Intensive Care Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
49
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
49
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Delirium is the most common neurological disorder in patients hospitalized in intensive care units (ICUs) with an incidence of 5 and 92% (1)(2) . It is associated with an increased hospital stay length, hospital costs, use of sedatives and mechanical restrictions, the accidental removal of catheters and tubes and increased mortality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Delirium is the most common neurological disorder in patients hospitalized in intensive care units (ICUs) with an incidence of 5 and 92% (1)(2) . It is associated with an increased hospital stay length, hospital costs, use of sedatives and mechanical restrictions, the accidental removal of catheters and tubes and increased mortality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guenther and colleagues 88 assessed the frequency of discrepancies between subjective and objective delirium monitoring. They compared a daily rating of patients' delirium status by bedside nurses, based on their clinical assessment, with a daily assessment www.ajcconline.org Systematic pain assessment can improve outcomes, and several assessment tools are now available.…”
Section: Deliriummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, comparisons of diagnostic methods for detecting delirium will inevitably produce different results, 1 and training in a particular diagnostic method will inevitably improve agreement with other assessors using that method. 2 In delirium diagnosis, it most important for clinicians and researchers to identify a diagnostic strategy that (1) identifies patients at higher risk of adverse outcome, independent of other markers of disease severity, and (2) identifies patients who will benefit from therapy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 Realizing that bedside delirium screening is not a replacement for a formal diagnostic evaluation by either a psychiatrist or neurologist, it nevertheless remains an efficient, low-risk assessment that will help ICU clinicians address reversible causes for delirium (when delirium is suspected), avoid treatments for agitation known to worsen delirium (eg, benzodiazepines), and promote regular interdisciplinary discussion regarding the cognitive status of all patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%