2005
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0505116102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implications of new petrographic analysis for the Olmec “mother culture” model

Abstract: ancient Mexico ͉ ethnographic models ͉ reciprocal exchange

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(7 reference statements)
1
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Earlier (Ocotillo phase) serving vessels share a different set of features with other Mesoamerican communities. The serving of cacao beverages at Puerto Escondido, in vessels that reflect participation in far-flung networks of interaction, strongly suggests that the later crystallization and spread of an Olmec style did not involve a wave of one-way cultural influence emanating from the Gulf Coast region (16)(17)(18)(19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier (Ocotillo phase) serving vessels share a different set of features with other Mesoamerican communities. The serving of cacao beverages at Puerto Escondido, in vessels that reflect participation in far-flung networks of interaction, strongly suggests that the later crystallization and spread of an Olmec style did not involve a wave of one-way cultural influence emanating from the Gulf Coast region (16)(17)(18)(19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study demonstrated that each area produced pottery with Early Horizon motifs locally and imported some white and some carved gray ware pottery from the San Lorenzo area. More controversially, the authors found no evidence for exchange of these ceramic types to San Lorenzo or between other regions, conclusions that are contradicted by petrographic analysis (see also Flannery et al, 2005;Stoltman et al, 2005). Although Blomster et al's study supports a significant role for San Lorenzo in the interregional exchange of pottery with Early Horizon motifs, additional sampling and analysis is needed to assess the degree to which other regions may have exchanged such pottery among themselves.…”
Section: Pottery Production and Exchangementioning
confidence: 84%
“…Neff and Glascock (2002) produced similar results while Kennett et al (2004) note that import of San Lorenzo ceramics to the Pacific Coast began by at least the Cherla phase. Stoltman et al (2005) and Flannery et al (2005) have criticized the results of the Blomster et al study, which have in turn been defended by Neff et al (2006c) and critiqued anew by Sharer et al (2006).…”
Section: Recent Research On the Archaic Periodmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The relationship between the Pacific Coast and the Gulf Coast during the Cherla to Jocotal periods is a subject of intense debate that is part of a wider discussion about the relationship of early complex societies throughout Mesoamerica (Blomster et al 2005;Clark 1997;Clark and Pye 2000;Demarest 1989;Diehl and Coe 1995;Flannery and Marcus 2000;Flannery et al 2005;Love 1991Love , 2002c. Often described as a division between the ''mother culture'' and the ''sister culture'' hypotheses, the discussion is actually much more fragmented, and many models are compatible with the available data.…”
Section: Recent Research On the Archaic Periodmentioning
confidence: 99%