2008
DOI: 10.1017/s0033291708004807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implications of modifying the duration requirement of generalized anxiety disorder in developed and developing countries

Abstract: Background-A number of western studies have suggested that the 6-month duration requirement of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) does not represent a critical threshold in terms of onset, course, or risk factors of the disorder. No study has examined the consequences of modifying the duration requirement across a wide range of correlates in both developed and developing countries.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
1
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(60 reference statements)
3
44
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…(WMHS; see also NCS-R). [78][79][80] When the duration was reduced to 3 months in the second Australian NSMHWB (which used the same assessment instrument as the WMHS) 13% more patients reported seeking treatment because of their anxiety and worry as compared with the 29% increase in the general population prevalence across the WMHS. [81] A number of studies have shown that a lower duration threshold (e.g., 1 month, 3 months) would identify respondents with similar symptom severity and clinical impairment to the current 6-month threshold (WHO Psychological Problems in Primary Care; NCS-R; Zurich Cohort Study).…”
Section: Dsm-v Options For ''A Number Of Events or Activities''mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(WMHS; see also NCS-R). [78][79][80] When the duration was reduced to 3 months in the second Australian NSMHWB (which used the same assessment instrument as the WMHS) 13% more patients reported seeking treatment because of their anxiety and worry as compared with the 29% increase in the general population prevalence across the WMHS. [81] A number of studies have shown that a lower duration threshold (e.g., 1 month, 3 months) would identify respondents with similar symptom severity and clinical impairment to the current 6-month threshold (WHO Psychological Problems in Primary Care; NCS-R; Zurich Cohort Study).…”
Section: Dsm-v Options For ''A Number Of Events or Activities''mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[79,82,83] Requiring a longer duration requirement (e.g., 12 months), however, would identify respondents with more severe and impairing symptoms than are found in DSM-IV GAD (WMHS). [78] Moreover, variations in the duration threshold would not substantially influence the type of person identified in DSM-V in terms of demographics (ECA; NCS-R; Zurich Cohort Study); [79,83,84] age of onset (WMHS); [78] familial risk of GAD (Virginia Twin Registry; NCS-R; EDSP); [77,85,86] or comorbidity profiles (ECA; Zurich Cohort Study; WMHS; EDSP). [62,78,83,84] Symptom endorsement profiles are also similar between DSM-IV-defined GAD and GAD of 3-5 month duration (German National Health Interview and Examination Survey).…”
Section: Dsm-v Options For ''A Number Of Events or Activities''mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, other studies elsewhere (Behar et al, 2005;Hale et al, 2006;Sugiura, 2007;Cassidy et al, 2009;Tan et al, 2010) have also supported the roles of cognitive and social factors in the development and maintenance of GAD. The prevalence of GAD symptoms among the participants was higher than the 3.0% annual prevalence rate of GAD in the general population in low income countries (Lee et al (2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…It is characterized by chronic worry (Comer & Kendall, 2004) and is twice common in women than in men (Tyrer & Baldwin, 2006). The prevalence rate in the general population is 3.1 % in United States of America (Kessler et al, 2005), 1.9% in Norway (MunkJorgensen et al, 2006), 4.1% in Belgium (Ansseau et al, 2005) and 3% in low income countries (Lee et al, 2009). Cognitive factors like intolerance of uncertainty (Behar et al, 2005;Sugiura, 2007;Tan et al, 2010) and social factors like parental attachment (Hale et al, 2006;Wood, 2006) are strong predictors of GAD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%