2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00227-007-0724-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implications of life history for genetic structure and migration rates of southern African coastal invertebrates: planktonic, abbreviated and direct development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
85
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
7
85
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Local variations in lifeehistory parameters, such as larval duration, but also delay of metamorphosis, initiation of spawning, local mortality or vertical position of the larvae within the water column, may provoke differences in the genetic structures of two closely-related species as shown for Mytilus (Becker et al, 2007). On the other hand, there are many proofs that gene flow is not necessarily proportional to the duration of the larval stage (e.g., Todd et al, 1998;Eckert, 2003;Teske et al, 2007). Closely-related species with similar life history and dispersal abilities may have contrasting levels of genetic structuring (Patarnello et al, 2007).…”
Section: Planktonic Larvae Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Local variations in lifeehistory parameters, such as larval duration, but also delay of metamorphosis, initiation of spawning, local mortality or vertical position of the larvae within the water column, may provoke differences in the genetic structures of two closely-related species as shown for Mytilus (Becker et al, 2007). On the other hand, there are many proofs that gene flow is not necessarily proportional to the duration of the larval stage (e.g., Todd et al, 1998;Eckert, 2003;Teske et al, 2007). Closely-related species with similar life history and dispersal abilities may have contrasting levels of genetic structuring (Patarnello et al, 2007).…”
Section: Planktonic Larvae Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In sessile coastal invertebrates, life history traits (e.g., direct development versus planktonic larvae) mainly determine dispersal capacity (Teske et al, 2007). Various geographic and hydrological barriers, as well as habitat preferences influence dispersal success and consequently the level of gene flow (Palumbi, 1994;McMillen-Jackson and Bert, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among benthic marine invertebrates, dispersal is typically accomplished by planktonic larvae, which are capable of dispersing passively in ocean currents, thus promoting genetic connectivity between geographically distant locations (Scheltema 1988;Ribeiro et al 2010). On the other hand, many marine species have direct development, lacking planktonic larvae, which imposes restrictions on their dispersal potential (Thiel 2003;Teske et al 2007). However, there is increasing evidence that the duration of pelagic stages is not directly correlated with dispersal potential (Johannesson 1988;Strathmann et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Levels of gene flow among them can be estimated using coalescent samplers, which provide better estimates of connectivity than F-statistics because they take into consideration the evolutionary histories and effective population sizes of the populations (Marko & Hart 2011). At smaller geographic scales and in the absence of strong oceanographic barriers, populations tend to exhibit lower levels of differentiation (Teske et al 2007) that merely manifest themselves in allele frequency differences (Johnson & Black 1984, Nicastro et al 2008. We attempted to estimate levels of gene flow among bay and coast populations using the coalescent samplers MIGRATE-N v3.2 (Beerli 2009) and IMa2 (Hey 2010), but neither method produced usable results for any of the data sets (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed pattern was attributed to asymmetrical levels of gene flow between bays and the open coast, with bays acting as sources of propagules (Nicastro et al 2008). As the structuring effects of oceanographic barriers can affect species with different levels of dispersal capability in a similar way (Teske et al 2007), genetic structure resulting from higher levels of genetic diversity in bays would be expected to be present in at least some sympatric species. Alternatively, sweepstakes-chance matching should manifest itself in lower levels of genetic diversity in new recruits relative to the adult population (Hedgecock 1994).…”
Section: Free Ree Access Ccessmentioning
confidence: 99%