1999
DOI: 10.1097/00007435-199904000-00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implications of Laboratory Tests of Condom Integrity

Abstract: The relative importance of breaks and holes is related to the volume of semen that contains an "infectious dose" of a sexually transmitted disease (STD). When 0.1 mL to 1.0 mL exposures to semen are necessary for disease transmission, the risk during latex condom use primarily results not from holes, but from breakage of condoms. For smaller volumes of semen exposure (0.00001 mL and less), the presence of holes can be as important as breaks. The same qualitative argument pertains to a comparison of "leaker" co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In vitro laboratory studies further indicate that latex condoms provide an effective physical barrier to STI pathogens. [11][12][13][14] Nevertheless, a decade ago, questions surrounding the effectiveness of condoms for STI prevention raised concerns regarding public health recommendations for their promotion and use. [15][16][17] Effectiveness is difficult to quantify because of measurement challenges inherent to clinical studies of condom use, including the absence of randomised controlled trials (and ethical issues precluding inclusion of a non-condom arm to persons at risk), reliance on self-reported measures of condom use, inadequate measures of consistent and correct use, and potentially low study power from infrequent STI outcomes.…”
Section: Condom Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vitro laboratory studies further indicate that latex condoms provide an effective physical barrier to STI pathogens. [11][12][13][14] Nevertheless, a decade ago, questions surrounding the effectiveness of condoms for STI prevention raised concerns regarding public health recommendations for their promotion and use. [15][16][17] Effectiveness is difficult to quantify because of measurement challenges inherent to clinical studies of condom use, including the absence of randomised controlled trials (and ethical issues precluding inclusion of a non-condom arm to persons at risk), reliance on self-reported measures of condom use, inadequate measures of consistent and correct use, and potentially low study power from infrequent STI outcomes.…”
Section: Condom Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 However, in vitro evidence [2][3][4] suggests that transmission of the largest STD pathogens (i.e., bacterial and protozoans) can be prevented by condom use. This study prospectively determined the association between African American adolescent females' condom use and their acquisition of biologically confirmed infection with Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, or Trichomonas vaginalis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Natural membrane condoms usually derived from lamb cecum are primarily meant for pregnancy prevention rather stopping STIs. In fact, the pores in the natural condoms are large enough to let the passage of small STI-causing organisms, particularly viruses [55]. On the other hand, the eicacy of synthetic condoms in the prevention of STIs has been proved by various epidemiological and laboratory studies [55].…”
Section: Puting the Physical Barriers To Stismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the pores in the natural condoms are large enough to let the passage of small STI-causing organisms, particularly viruses [55]. On the other hand, the eicacy of synthetic condoms in the prevention of STIs has been proved by various epidemiological and laboratory studies [55]. Synthetic condoms are either made of latex or other nonlatex material such as polyurethane or polyisoprene.…”
Section: Puting the Physical Barriers To Stismentioning
confidence: 99%