2016
DOI: 10.14411/eje.2016.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implications of insect responses to supernormal visual releasing stimuli in intersexual communication and flower-visiting behaviour: A review

Abstract: Abstract. Animals, including human beings, tend to respond more strongly to stimuli that are associated with the highest relative rewards. This applies not only to food rewards but also to reproductive success. In the present review article this issue is discussed for insects in connection with intersexual communication and fl ower-visiting behaviour. Implications of the preference for supernormal visual releasing stimuli are examined from a sensory and evolutionary perspective, including a consideration of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That aggression and a subsequent attack could have turned into a mating episode is possible but unlikely as combat between male cicadas is rare. With the dead individual’s slightly larger body resembling that of a female (and the lack of a defensive reaction when approached by the live male), a supernormal visual releasing stimulus as described by Kral [ 12 ] in the European Journal of Entomology for exceptionally attractive sex partners, could possibly have been involved. Not to be dismissed are also the possibilities that the male could have been confused and thought it was mounting a live female, or that there are cicada males that are attracted to other males and would be rebuffed by living (heterosexual) males.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That aggression and a subsequent attack could have turned into a mating episode is possible but unlikely as combat between male cicadas is rare. With the dead individual’s slightly larger body resembling that of a female (and the lack of a defensive reaction when approached by the live male), a supernormal visual releasing stimulus as described by Kral [ 12 ] in the European Journal of Entomology for exceptionally attractive sex partners, could possibly have been involved. Not to be dismissed are also the possibilities that the male could have been confused and thought it was mounting a live female, or that there are cicada males that are attracted to other males and would be rebuffed by living (heterosexual) males.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If intersubspecific mating occurs in the subspecies crucivora and rapae, hybrids are viable with a highly variable UV pattern in the females [ 99 ]. The flutter response was also described in Pieris napi [ 4 , 62 ], Hypolimnas bolina [ 100 ], and in Colias eurytheme , where it functions as a signal of unreceptive behaviour [ 1 ]. It seems that the presence of UV reflectance in certain specific species could be explained by Amotz Zahavi’s ‘handicap principle’ [ 45 ], which proposes that such signals are evolutionarily stable because their expression is costly.…”
Section: The Adaptive Function Of Uv Reflectance and Its Perception I...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Responses to a supernormal stimulus may be considered maladaptive because the organism shows a stronger response to the supernormal stimulus than to the natural one. Exaggerated responses to supernormal stimuli have been investigated in various species, including birds (Baerends, 1959;Grim & Honza, 2001;Tanaka, Morimoto, Stevens, & Ueda, 2011), insects (Jaffe, Miras & Cabrera, 2007;Kral, 2016;Shermer, 2015), baboons (Bielert & Anderson, 1985), and even humans (Doyle & Pazhoohi, 2012;Morris, White, Morrison, & Fisher, 2013). The critical element is that the supernormal stimulus contains features of the natural releasing stimulus in an exaggerated form that is not encountered in nature and therefore has to be fabricated artificially.…”
Section: Pre-preprogramed Responses: Supernormal Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%