2011
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.110.125625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implications of Host Genetic Variation on the Risk and Prevalence of Infectious Diseases Transmitted Through the Environment

Abstract: Previous studies have shown that host genetic heterogeneity in the response to infectious challenge can affect the emergence risk and the severity of diseases transmitted through direct contact between individuals. However, there is substantial uncertainty about the degree and direction of influence owing to different definitions of genetic variation, most of which are not in line with the current understanding of the genetic architecture of disease traits. Also, the relevance of previous results for diseases … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(92 reference statements)
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many things that impact the spread of an infectious disease epidemic in animals that include host genetics [60] and the environment [61]-with potential implications for impacting disease spread associated with climate change [62]. However, using appropriately scaled models to match the data collected from previous epidemics and observed disease characteristics can help alleviate the impacts of these micro impacts on overall simulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many things that impact the spread of an infectious disease epidemic in animals that include host genetics [60] and the environment [61]-with potential implications for impacting disease spread associated with climate change [62]. However, using appropriately scaled models to match the data collected from previous epidemics and observed disease characteristics can help alleviate the impacts of these micro impacts on overall simulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schliekelman (2007) seems to be the first who used rigorous mathematical modelling to investigate the impact of kin selection on the frequency of mutant alleles conferring resistance to the host. Moreover, despite the evidence of heterogeneity in infectivity (Woolhouse et al, 1997;Lloyd-Smith et al, 2005;Doeschl-Wilson et al, 2011), little attention has been given to the effect of kin selection on the frequency of alleles affecting infectivity in the host population. Our simulations show that, at least in theory, kin selection can greatly accelerate the evolution of R 0 , because it utilizes the indirect genetic variance in both susceptibility and infectivity in the host population.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A novel pathogen could potentially threaten entire populations that lack the necessary MHCII diversity to adapt (O'Brien and Evermann, 1988;Doeschl-Wilson et al, 2011). Climate change, combined with anthropogenic factors, may increase the risk of arthropod-borne diseases (Gubler et al, 2001) and, if this increases exposure of southern populations of koalas to arthropod vectors, their potential to become reservoirs for zoonotic pathogens may increase.…”
Section: Consequences Of Low Mhcii Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, chlamydiosis is the most common infectious disease of koalas, inducing proliferative conjunctivitis and urogenital tract disease (Cockram and Jackson, 1974;Obendorf, 1981), and is present in most koala populations, besides some offshore islands (Martin and Handasyde, 1999). Second, host genetic diversity may be important for population-wide defense against new pathogens and emerging diseases (Yates et al, 2006;Doeschl-Wilson et al, 2011). Koalas with low genetic diversity could become potential reservoirs for emerging pathogens and therefore a biosecurity risk to livestock and human populations as a result of increased habitat overlap from anthropogenic or environmental changes (Daszak et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%