2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.01.28.923524
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implications of genetic heterogeneity for plant translocation during ecological restoration

Abstract: 1Ecological restoration practices often require translocating plant material from distant sites. 2 Yet published guidelines for seed transfer are available in very few species. Accurately pre-3 dicting how plant populations will perform when transferred requires multi-year and multi-4 environment field trials and comprehensive follow-up census work. In this study, we analyzed 5 the genetic structure of an important shrub used in ecological restorations in the Southern 6 Rocky Mountains called alderleaf mountai… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Linear models for population genetic differences can test for evidence of demic structure beyond what could be predicted from geographic distance alone (e.g., Crow et al, 2020;Gompert, Comeault, et al, 2014;Parchman et al, 2016). Additionally, alternative models can explicitly parameterize continuous clinal variation and guide understanding of the contribution of demic and clinal variation to population structure (Battey et al, 2020;Bradburd et al, 2013Bradburd et al, , 2016.…”
Section: Limitati On S and Further Direc Tionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linear models for population genetic differences can test for evidence of demic structure beyond what could be predicted from geographic distance alone (e.g., Crow et al, 2020;Gompert, Comeault, et al, 2014;Parchman et al, 2016). Additionally, alternative models can explicitly parameterize continuous clinal variation and guide understanding of the contribution of demic and clinal variation to population structure (Battey et al, 2020;Bradburd et al, 2013Bradburd et al, , 2016.…”
Section: Limitati On S and Further Direc Tionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pairwise genetic distance scores and genetic diversity estimates for each of the 24 study populations were taken from a previous study of mountain mahogany genetic structure (Crow et al 2020). In summary, total DNA was extracted from leaf samples from 30 individuals per population, digested with EcoRI and MseI restriction enzymes, and barcoded fragments were pooled and amplified (following Parchman et al 2012).…”
Section: Study Locations and Plant Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, total DNA was extracted from leaf samples from 30 individuals per population, digested with EcoRI and MseI restriction enzymes, and barcoded fragments were pooled and amplified (following Parchman et al 2012). For more detail on genetic sequence data processing and results, see Crow et al (2020).…”
Section: Study Locations and Plant Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model in entropy and other structure-like models do not address these directly. Linear models for population genetic differences can test for evidence of demic structure beyond what could be predicted from geographic distance alone (e.g., Gompert et al, 2014a;Parchman et al, 2016;Crow et al, 2020). Additionally, alternative models can explicitly parameterize continuous clinal variation and guide understanding of the contribution of demic and clinal variation to population structure (Bradburd et al, 2013(Bradburd et al, , 2016Battey et al, 2020).…”
Section: Limitations and Further Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%